On the Diagnosis of Mycotic Aortic Aneurysms.
Details
Download: 29497343_BIB_CE004A8733F8.pdf (723.45 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_CE004A8733F8
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
On the Diagnosis of Mycotic Aortic Aneurysms.
Journal
Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology
ISSN
1179-5468 (Print)
ISSN-L
1179-5468
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2018
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
12
Pages
1179546818759678
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
There is striking paucity in consensus on the terminology, definition, and diagnostic criteria of mycotic aortic aneurysms. This literature study aims to elucidate this scientific omission, discuss its consequences, and present a proposition for reporting items on this disease.
A systematic literature review on PubMed and Medline using javax.xml.bind.JAXBElement@32b5ae12 and javax.xml.bind.JAXBElement@6f070024 between 1850 and 2017 was performed. Articles were assessed according to a protocol regarding terminology, definition, and diagnostic criteria. Case series with less than 5 patients were excluded.
A total of 49 articles were included. The most prevalent term was mycotic aortic aneurysm but there was no widely accepted definition. Most modern publications used a diagnostic workup based on a combination on clinical presentation, laboratory results, imaging findings, and intraoperative findings. How these protean variables should be balanced was unclear. A proposition of reporting items was framed and consisted of definition of disease used, basis of diagnostic workup, exclusion criteria, patient characteristics, laboratory and imaging findings, aneurysm anatomy, details on treatment, pre/postoperative antibiotic treatment, and details on follow-up.
This article emphasizes the need to standardize definition, terminology, and diagnostic criteria for mycotic aortic aneurysms and proposes reporting items enhancing comparability between studies.
A systematic literature review on PubMed and Medline using javax.xml.bind.JAXBElement@32b5ae12 and javax.xml.bind.JAXBElement@6f070024 between 1850 and 2017 was performed. Articles were assessed according to a protocol regarding terminology, definition, and diagnostic criteria. Case series with less than 5 patients were excluded.
A total of 49 articles were included. The most prevalent term was mycotic aortic aneurysm but there was no widely accepted definition. Most modern publications used a diagnostic workup based on a combination on clinical presentation, laboratory results, imaging findings, and intraoperative findings. How these protean variables should be balanced was unclear. A proposition of reporting items was framed and consisted of definition of disease used, basis of diagnostic workup, exclusion criteria, patient characteristics, laboratory and imaging findings, aneurysm anatomy, details on treatment, pre/postoperative antibiotic treatment, and details on follow-up.
This article emphasizes the need to standardize definition, terminology, and diagnostic criteria for mycotic aortic aneurysms and proposes reporting items enhancing comparability between studies.
Keywords
Mycotic, aneurysm, aorta, criteria, diagnosis, infected, reporting standards, revised, terminology
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
10/03/2018 10:14
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:48