More than noise? Explaining instances of minority preference in correspondence studies of recruitment

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_CD50323DB97E
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
More than noise? Explaining instances of minority preference in correspondence studies of recruitment
Périodique
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Auteur(s)
Bonoli Giuliano, Fossati Flavia
ISSN
1369-183X
1469-9451
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
25/07/2018
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Pages
1-17
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Correspondence studies of labour market discrimination find that minorities, which in general suffer disadvantage, are sometimes preferred in a choice against members of the majority. This outcome has been observed in several studies of ethnic or nationality-based discrimination, but also in studies focusing on other characteristics, such as unemployment and being overweight. However, it is generally not explained and dismissed as noise. In this paper we challenge this understanding, and, using meta-analytical techniques, we show that instances of minority preference are not randomly distributed. We also show that they are more frequent for groups which overall suffer stronger discrimination and for high skilled professionals. We reason that this result may be explained with the fact that groups that suffer discrimination have fewer alternatives in the labour market and this makes them more attractive for jobs of sub-standard quality and for jobs in which turnover costs are high (e.g. high skilled professionals). We conclude by arguing that since tests in which the minority candidate is preferred are not randomly distributed, future research should study the determinants of minority preference in a more systematic manner.
Mots-clé
Correspondence testing, discrimination, minority, hiring, employers
Financement(s)
Fonds national suisse
Création de la notice
25/03/2019 16:36
Dernière modification de la notice
10/09/2019 14:48
Données d'usage