Fast track algorithm: How to differentiate a "scleroderma pattern" from a "non-scleroderma pattern".

Details

Ressource 1Download: Fast track algorithm- How to differentiate a “scleroderma pattern” from a “non-scleroderma pattern”.pdf (3283.72 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_CABDEDF2BD73
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Fast track algorithm: How to differentiate a "scleroderma pattern" from a "non-scleroderma pattern".
Journal
Autoimmunity reviews
Author(s)
Smith V., Vanhaecke A., Herrick A.L., Distler O., Guerra M.G., Denton C.P., Deschepper E., Foeldvari I., Gutierrez M., Hachulla E., Ingegnoli F., Kubo S., Müller-Ladner U., Riccieri V., Sulli A., van Laar J.M., Vonk M.C., Walker U.A., Cutolo M.
Working group(s)
EULAR Study Group on Microcirculation in Rheumatic Diseases
ISSN
1873-0183 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1568-9972
Publication state
Published
Issued date
11/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
18
Number
11
Pages
102394
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
This study was designed to propose a simple "Fast Track algorithm" for capillaroscopists of any level of experience to differentiate "scleroderma patterns" from "non-scleroderma patterns" on capillaroscopy and to assess its inter-rater reliability.
Based on existing definitions to categorise capillaroscopic images as "scleroderma patterns" and taking into account the real life variability of capillaroscopic images described standardly according to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Study Group on Microcirculation in Rheumatic Diseases, a fast track decision tree, the "Fast Track algorithm" was created by the principal expert (VS) to facilitate swift categorisation of an image as "non-scleroderma pattern (category 1)" or "scleroderma pattern (category 2)". Mean inter-rater reliability between all raters (experts/attendees) of the 8th EULAR course on capillaroscopy in Rheumatic Diseases (Genoa, 2018) and, as external validation, of the 8th European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) course on systemic sclerosis (SSc) (Nijmegen, 2019) versus the principal expert, as well as reliability between the rater pairs themselves was assessed by mean Cohen's and Light's kappa coefficients.
Mean Cohen's kappa was 1/0.96 (95% CI 0.95-0.98) for the 6 experts/135 attendees of the 8th EULAR capillaroscopy course and 1/0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.96) for the 3 experts/85 attendees of the 8th EUSTAR SSc course. Light's kappa was 1/0.92 at the 8th EULAR capillaroscopy course, and 1/0.87 at the 8th EUSTAR SSc course.
For the first time, a clinical expert based fast track decision algorithm has been developed to differentiate a "non-scleroderma" from a "scleroderma pattern" on capillaroscopic images, demonstrating excellent reliability when applied by capillaroscopists with varying levels of expertise versus the principal expert and corroborated with external validation.
Keywords
Algorithms, Humans, Microscopic Angioscopy/methods, Reproducibility of Results, Scleroderma, Localized/diagnosis, Scleroderma, Systemic/diagnosis, Algorithm, Capillaroscopy, EULAR Study Group on Microcirculation in Rheumatic Diseases, Experts, Novices, Reliability, “Scleroderma patterns”
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
07/01/2020 12:07
Last modification date
23/04/2024 6:16
Usage data