Hostile sexist male patients and female doctors - A challenging encounter
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_C6AA281E8A97
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Hostile sexist male patients and female doctors - A challenging encounter
Journal
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
ISSN
1178-1653
Publication state
Published
Issued date
03/2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
7
Number
1
Pages
37-45
Language
english
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Patient characteristics and attitudes can affect how patients react to the physician's communication style, and this reaction can then influence consultation outcomes.
OBJECTIVE:
The goal of the present study was to investigate whether the attitude of a sexist male patient affects how he perceives a female physician's nonverbal communication and whether this then results in expecting less positive consultation outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING:
Participants were analog patients who viewed four videotaped male and four videotaped female physicians in a consultation with one of their patients. Physician videos were preselected to represent a range of high and low patient-centered physician nonverbal behavior. Participants filled in questionnaires to assess how patient-centered they perceived the female and male physicians' nonverbal communication to be, and participants indicated how positive they expected the consultation outcomes to be. Moreover, we assessed the participants' sexist attitudes with a questionnaire measuring hostile and benevolent sexism.
PARTICIPANTS:
Students (N = 60) from a French-speaking university in Switzerland were recruited on campus.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:
The main outcome measures were the extent to which analog patients expect the consultation outcomes to be positive (high satisfaction, increased trust in the physician, intention to adhere to treatment recommendations, and perceived physician competence) and the extent to which analog patients perceive physicians as patient-centered (judged from the physicians' nonverbal cues).
RESULTS:
Male analog patients' hostile sexism was negatively related to perceiving the physicians as patient-centered, and male analog patients' hostile sexism was also negatively related to expected positive consultation outcomes. For male patients viewing female physicians, mediation analysis revealed that perceived physician patient-centeredness mediated the negative relationship between hostile sexism and expected positive consultation outcomes.
CONCLUSION:
Male hostile sexist patients perceive a female physician's nonverbal communication as less patient-centered and this negatively affects their expectation of positive outcomes from the consultation.
Patient characteristics and attitudes can affect how patients react to the physician's communication style, and this reaction can then influence consultation outcomes.
OBJECTIVE:
The goal of the present study was to investigate whether the attitude of a sexist male patient affects how he perceives a female physician's nonverbal communication and whether this then results in expecting less positive consultation outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING:
Participants were analog patients who viewed four videotaped male and four videotaped female physicians in a consultation with one of their patients. Physician videos were preselected to represent a range of high and low patient-centered physician nonverbal behavior. Participants filled in questionnaires to assess how patient-centered they perceived the female and male physicians' nonverbal communication to be, and participants indicated how positive they expected the consultation outcomes to be. Moreover, we assessed the participants' sexist attitudes with a questionnaire measuring hostile and benevolent sexism.
PARTICIPANTS:
Students (N = 60) from a French-speaking university in Switzerland were recruited on campus.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:
The main outcome measures were the extent to which analog patients expect the consultation outcomes to be positive (high satisfaction, increased trust in the physician, intention to adhere to treatment recommendations, and perceived physician competence) and the extent to which analog patients perceive physicians as patient-centered (judged from the physicians' nonverbal cues).
RESULTS:
Male analog patients' hostile sexism was negatively related to perceiving the physicians as patient-centered, and male analog patients' hostile sexism was also negatively related to expected positive consultation outcomes. For male patients viewing female physicians, mediation analysis revealed that perceived physician patient-centeredness mediated the negative relationship between hostile sexism and expected positive consultation outcomes.
CONCLUSION:
Male hostile sexist patients perceive a female physician's nonverbal communication as less patient-centered and this negatively affects their expectation of positive outcomes from the consultation.
Keywords
Decision-making, Nonverbal communication, Benevolent sexism, Health outcomes, Analog patients, Centered care, Physicians, Gender, Preferences, Perceptions
Web of science
Publisher's website
Create date
10/11/2014 17:56
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:42