The Cancer-Specific Health Economic Measure QLU-C10D is Valid and Responsive for Assessing Health Utility in Patients with Thyroid Cancer.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_C22A28D94D42
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
The Cancer-Specific Health Economic Measure QLU-C10D is Valid and Responsive for Assessing Health Utility in Patients with Thyroid Cancer.
Journal
Thyroid
Author(s)
Pilz M.J., Seyringer S., Singer S., Ioannidis G., Sykiotis G.P., Arraras J.I., Husson O., Iakovou I., Fanetti G., Führer D., Inhestern J., Kiyota N., Locati L.D., Pinto M., Gama R.R., King M.T., Norman R., Gamper E.M.
Working group(s)
EORTC Quality of Life Group
ISSN
1557-9077 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1050-7256
Publication state
Published
Issued date
11/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
34
Number
11
Pages
1356-1370
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Validation Study
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Background: Health economic appraisals often rely on the assessment of health utilities using preference-based measures (PBM). The cancer-specific PBM, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Utility - Core 10 Dimensions (EORTC QLU-C10D), was developed recently, and now needs to be validated in various clinical populations. Methods: In a multicenter, multinational prospective cohort study, we longitudinally collected EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L data from patients with thyroid cancer. We applied seven country-specific value sets to the QLQ-C30 data to derive country-specific utility values and used the EQ-5D-5L as a comparator PBM. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating index scores and Bland-Altman plots. Construct validity was investigated by correlating domain scores. Known-group comparisons and responsiveness were assessed using external clinical criteria. Results: A total of 181 patients with thyroid cancer from nine countries (three continents) provided analyzable data. Patients were included if they had differentiated, medullary, or anaplastic thyroid cancer. Mean utility values of both instruments were generally lower compared to general population norms. No floor or ceiling effects were present for the QLU-C10D. The intra-class correlation for EQ-5D-5L and QLU-C10D index values ranged from 0.761 to 0.901 across the measurement timepoints, supporting criterion validity. Spearman's correlation coefficients ranged from 0.289 to 0.716 for theoretically corresponding domain pairs. The QLU-C10D detected differences in 9 of 15 known-group comparisons, supporting sensitivity. Clinically important changes were detected by all QLU-C10D country specific value sets, supporting responsiveness. Further, the QLU-C10D had higher statistical efficiency than the EQ-5D-5L in 74.7% of comparisons. Conclusions: The QLU-C10D is a valid PBM for health economic evaluations in thyroid cancer studies. We recommend its use to estimate health utilities in economic evaluations of thyroid cancer therapies.
Keywords
Humans, Thyroid Neoplasms/economics, Thyroid Neoplasms/therapy, Female, Male, Quality of Life, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Adult, Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Longitudinal Studies, Thyroid Carcinoma, Anaplastic/therapy, Health Status, Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/economics, EQ-5D-5L, QLU-C10D, cancer-specific preference-based measure, psychometrics, responsiveness, sensitivity, thyroid cancer, validation
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
01/11/2024 13:13
Last modification date
20/11/2024 7:16
Usage data