How reliable is renal ultrasound to measure renal length and volume in patients with chronic kidney disease compared with magnetic resonance imaging?

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_BE378390EACB
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
How reliable is renal ultrasound to measure renal length and volume in patients with chronic kidney disease compared with magnetic resonance imaging?
Journal
Acta radiologica
Author(s)
Braconnier P., Piskunowicz M., Vakilzadeh N., Müller M.E., Zürcher E., Burnier M., Pruijm M.
ISSN
1600-0455 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0284-1851
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
61
Number
1
Pages
117-127
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Renal length, volume, and parenchymal thickness are important clinical parameters, yet data concerning the accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasound (US)-based renal length and volume assessment in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are scarce.
To establish whether renal length, volume, and parenchymal thickness can be reliably measured with renal US in patients with CKD.
All participants underwent renal US, immediately followed by 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Renal length, width, transverse diameter, and parenchyma thickness were measured with both methods; renal volume was calculated using the ellipsoid formula. A total of 45 patients with CKD (eGFR [mean ± SD] 57.4 ± 4.4 mL/min/1.73 m <sup>2</sup> ) and 46 participants without CKD (eGFR 97.0 ± 2.4 mL/min/1.73 m <sup>2</sup> ) were included.
US-measured renal length correlated strongly with MRI-measured renal length in no-CKD patients (Spearman's r = 0.83 and 0.85 for the right and left kidney, respectively; P < 0.005) and CKD patients (r = 0.89 and 0.92 for the right and left kidney, respectively; P < 0.005). There was a significant but weaker correlation between MRI- and US-measured right and left renal volume (r = 0.72, P < 0.005) in no-CKD (r = 0.74 and r = 0.72, respectively; for both: P < 0.005) and CKD patients (r = 0.83 and 0.85, P < 0.005). Weak to moderate correlations were found for parenchyma thickness for the right (CKD group: r = 0.29, no-CKD: r = 0.23; for both: P < 0.05) and left kidney (CKD: r = 0.52, no-CKD group: r = 0.37, P < 0.05). Both intra-observer (Pearson's correlations of 0.82 for the right and 0.89 for the left kidney) and inter-observer (Lin's correlation coefficient of 0.90 for the right and 0.82 for the left kidney) reproducibility of US-assessed renal length was high.
US-based assessment of renal length in CKD patients is comparable to MRI measures. Both intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of US-assessed renal length in CKD patients are high. Measurements of US renal volume and parenchymal thickness should, however, be interpreted with caution.
Keywords
Female, Humans, Kidney/diagnostic imaging, Kidney/pathology, Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods, Male, Middle Aged, Organ Size, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnostic imaging, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/pathology, Reproducibility of Results, Ultrasonography/methods, Magnetic resonance imaging, chronic kidney disease, kidney volume, renal length, ultrasonography
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
26/05/2019 14:09
Last modification date
23/01/2020 6:19
Usage data