独特性之后:法庭科学意见的演进 (After uniqueness: the evolution of forensic science opinions)

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: Thompson_etla_2018_EvidenceScience.pdf (2715.71 [Ko])
Etat: Serval
Version: de l'auteur
ID Serval
serval:BIB_BD79C38F1BAE
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
独特性之后:法庭科学意见的演进 (After uniqueness: the evolution of forensic science opinions)
Périodique
Evidence Science
Auteur(s)
Thompson William, Vuille Joëlle, Taroni Franco, Biedermann Alex
Traducteur(s)
Wang Henry Zhuhao
ISSN
1674-1226
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
25/08/2018
Volume
26
Numéro
4
Pages
503-513
Langue
chinois
Notes
Vuille and Biedermann gratefully acknowledge the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation through grants no. PZ00P1_154955/1 and BSSGI0_155809. Thompson gratefully acknowledges support from the Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence (CSAFE).
Résumé
Big Changes are occurring in forensic science, particularly among experts who compare the patterns found in fingerprints, footwear impressions, toolmarks, handwriting, and the like. Forensic examiners are reaching conclusions in new ways and changing the language they use in reports and testimony. This article explains these changes and the challenges they pose for lawyers and judges.
Mots-clé
Forensic science, Expert, Pattern-matching disciplines, Certainty and probability, Likelihood ratio, error rate
Création de la notice
17/10/2018 11:29
Dernière modification de la notice
16/11/2018 8:08
Données d'usage