A novel kinematic detection of foot-strike and toe-off events during noninstrumented treadmill running to estimate contact time.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 1-s2.0-S0021929021005042-main.pdf (1283.70 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_BD614F5237AA
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
A novel kinematic detection of foot-strike and toe-off events during noninstrumented treadmill running to estimate contact time.
Journal
Journal of biomechanics
Author(s)
Patoz A., Lussiana T., Gindre C., Malatesta D.
ISSN
1873-2380 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0021-9290
Publication state
Published
Issued date
09/11/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
128
Pages
110737
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Contact time (t <sub>c</sub> ) relies upon the accuracy of foot-strike and toe-off events, for which ground reaction force (GRF) is the gold standard. However, force plates are not always available, e.g., when running on a noninstrumented treadmill. In this situation, a kinematic algorithm (KA) - an algorithm based on motion capture data - might be used if it performs equally for all foot-strike angles across speeds. The purpose of this study was to propose a novel KA, using a combination of heel and toe kinematics (three markers per foot), to detect foot-strike and toe-off and compare it to GRF at different speeds and across foot-strike angles. One hundred runners ran at 9 km/h, 11 km/h, and 13 km/h. Force data and whole-body kinematic data were acquired by an instrumented treadmill and optoelectronic system. Foot-strike and toe-off showed small systematic biases between GRF and KA at all speeds (≤5 ms), except toe-off at 11 km/h (no bias). The root mean square error (RMSE) was ≤9 ms and was mostly constant across foot-strike angles for toe-off (7.4 ms) but not for foot-strike (4.1-11.1 ms). Small systematic biases (≤8 ms) and significant differences (P ≤ 0.01) were reported for t <sub>c</sub> at all speeds, and the RMSE was ≤14 ms (≤5%). The RMSE for t <sub>c</sub> increased with increasing foot-strike angle (3.5-5.4%). Nonetheless, this novel KA computed smaller errors than existing methods for foot-strike, toe-off, and t <sub>c</sub> . Therefore, this study supports the use of this novel KA to accurately estimate foot-strike, toe-off, and t <sub>c</sub> from kinematic data obtained during noninstrumented treadmill running independent of the foot-strike angle.
Keywords
Biomechanical Phenomena, Foot, Gait, Running, Toes, Event detection, Forefoot running, Gait analysis, Gait events, Midfoot running, Rearfoot running
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
07/09/2021 17:28
Last modification date
23/03/2023 7:53
Usage data