The choice of the most adequate surgical technique for upper limb defects remains challenging. The aim of this article is to discuss the main microsurgical (pedicled or free) reconstructive options for the post-oncological reconstruction of different anatomical areas of the upper extremity.
We reviewed different reconstructive methods reported in the literature needing microsurgical expertise and compared them to our clinical experience, in order to provide further guidance in the choice of different flaps for upper limb soft tissue reconstruction. Six clinical cases, one for each anatomical district, are presented as examples of possible solutions.
We report the options available in the literature for post-oncologic upper limb reconstruction, dividing them by anatomical area and type of flap: local flaps, regional flaps, free flaps, and distant pedicled flaps. Our examples of the reconstruction of each anatomical area of the upper limb include one reverse ulnar pedicled perforator flap, one free Antero-Lateral Thigh (ALT) flow-through flap, one perforator-based lateral arm flap, two myocutaneous latissimus dorsi pedicled flaps, and one parascapular perforator-plus flap.
In oncological cases, it is important to consider reconstructive options that provide stable tissue and allow for the early healing of the donor and recipient site if the patient needs to undergo adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy. A wider range of flap options is essential when choosing the proper technique according to the patient's needs, surgeon's preference, and logistical possibilities. Perforator flaps combine the advantages of other flaps, but they require microsurgical expertise. Free flap reconstruction remains the gold standard to obtain a better overall and cosmetic outcome in complex and wide defects, where no suitable local pedicled flap option exists. The pedicled latissimus dorsi flap should still be included among the reconstructive options for its strong vascularization, size, and arc of transposition.