A Single Sacral-Mounted Inertial Measurement Unit to Estimate Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force, Contact Time, and Flight Time in Running.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 2022_Patoz-Malatesta.pdf (480.61 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_BCD5CD8BAEED
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
A Single Sacral-Mounted Inertial Measurement Unit to Estimate Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force, Contact Time, and Flight Time in Running.
Journal
Sensors
Author(s)
Patoz A., Lussiana T., Breine B., Gindre C., Malatesta D.
ISSN
1424-8220 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1424-8220
Publication state
Published
Issued date
20/01/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
22
Number
3
Pages
784
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Peak vertical ground reaction force (Fz,max), contact time (tc), and flight time (tf) are key variables of running biomechanics. The gold standard method (GSM) to measure these variables is a force plate. However, a force plate is not always at hand and not very portable overground. In such situation, the vertical acceleration signal recorded by an inertial measurement unit (IMU) might be used to estimate Fz,max, tc, and tf. Hence, the first purpose of this study was to propose a method that used data recorded by a single sacral-mounted IMU (IMU method: IMUM) to estimate Fz,max. The second aim of this study was to estimate tc and tf using the same IMU data. The vertical acceleration threshold of an already existing IMUM was modified to detect foot-strike and toe-off events instead of effective foot-strike and toe-off events. Thus, tc and tf estimations were obtained instead of effective contact and flight time estimations. One hundred runners ran at 9, 11, and 13 km/h. IMU data (208 Hz) and force data (200 Hz) were acquired by a sacral-mounted IMU and an instrumented treadmill, respectively. The errors obtained when comparing Fz,max, tc, and tf estimated using the IMUM to Fz,max, tc, and tf measured using the GSM were comparable to the errors obtained using previously published methods. In fact, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.15 BW (6%) was obtained for Fz,max while a RMSE of 20 ms was reported for both tc and tf (8% and 18%, respectively). Moreover, even though small systematic biases of 0.07 BW for Fz,max and 13 ms for tc and tf were reported, the RMSEs were smaller than the smallest real differences [Fz,max: 0.28 BW (11%), tc: 32.0 ms (13%), and tf: 32.0 ms (30%)], indicating no clinically important difference between the GSM and IMUM. Therefore, these results support the use of the IMUM to estimate Fz,max, tc, and tf for level treadmill runs at low running speeds, especially because an IMU has the advantage to be low-cost and portable and therefore seems very practical for coaches and healthcare professionals.
Keywords
Acceleration, Biomechanical Phenomena, Foot, Gait, Mechanical Phenomena, Running, accelerometer, biomechanics, gait analysis, sensor
Pubmed
Open Access
Yes
Create date
20/01/2022 14:54
Last modification date
21/11/2022 9:21
Usage data