Accuracy of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the evaluation of residual cervical carcinoma after radiation therapy

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_BBDA4B426116
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Accuracy of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the evaluation of residual cervical carcinoma after radiation therapy
Journal
Gynecol Oncol
Author(s)
Levy A., Caramella C., Chargari C., Medjhoul A., Rey A., Zareski E., Boulet B., Bidault F., Dromain C., Balleyguier C.
ISSN-L
1095-6859 (Electronic)0090-8258 (Linking)
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2011
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
123
Number
1
Pages
110-5
Language
english
Notes
Levy, AntoninCaramella, CarolineChargari, CyrusMedjhoul, AichaRey, AnnieZareski, EliseBoulet, BereniceBidault, FrancoisDromain, ClarisseBalleyguier, Corinneeng2011/07/19 06:00Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Oct;123(1):110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The impact of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of MR imaging on the evaluation of residual Uterine Cervical Carcinoma after Radiation Therapy, in addition to conventional MR images. METHODS: Fourty-nine women presenting with a uterine cervical cancer were examined with 1.5 T MRI and DWI, 8 (4-20) weeks after treatment. Treatment response was determined based on the histopathological results after therapy and was classified as a complete response (CR) or residual disease (RD). Post-treatment DWI and ADC results were compared. RESULTS: Five (11%) and 44 (89%) patients were considered as having histologically-proven RD or a CR respectively. The mean ADC of cervical tissue for all patients was 1.74+/-0.324x10(-3) mm(2)/s and the SD was 1.94+/-1.11x10(-4). The mean ADC was 1.62+/-0.21x10(-3) mm(2)/s (SD=1.45x10(-4)) for the 5 patients with RD versus 1.76+/-0.33x10(-3) mm(2)/s (SD=1.99x10(-4)) for the 44 patients with a CR (p=0.09). Using 1.7x10(-3) mm(2)/s as a radiological cut-off value for the ADC, all patients classified as having histologically-proven RD had a mean ADC of </=1.7x10(-3). In 12 (25%) cases, RD was suspected on T2-weighted MRI images alone. Eight of these cases were considered as false positives compared to the histological results. Their mean ADC was 1.98x10(-3) mm(2)/s and none of them had an ADC of <1.7x10(-3) mm(2)/s. CONCLUSION: Although our results were not statistically significant, ADC values could potentially be used to predict and monitor the response of uterine cervical cancer.
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/*methods, Echo-Planar Imaging/*methods, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/*pathology/*radiotherapy
Create date
16/09/2016 10:13
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:29
Usage data