Thoughts Unlocked by Technology—a Survey in Germany About Brain-Computer Interfaces
Details
Download: s11569-021-00392-w.pdf (532.88 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: Not specified
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: Not specified
Secondary document(s)
Download: Schmid JR et al. NanonEthics 2021.pdf (532.88 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: Not specified
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_BAE58290E650
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Thoughts Unlocked by Technology—a Survey in Germany About Brain-Computer Interfaces
Journal
NanoEthics
ISSN
1871-4757
1871-4765
1871-4765
Publication state
Published
Issued date
02/11/2021
Language
english
Abstract
A brain-computer interface (BCI) is a rapidly evolving neurotechnology connecting the human brain with a computer. In its classic form, brain activity is recorded and used to control external devices like protheses or wheelchairs. Thus, BCI users act with the power of their thoughts. While the initial development has focused on medical uses of BCIs, non-medical applications have recently been gaining more attention, for example in automobiles, airplanes, and the entertainment context. However, the attitudes of the general public towards BCIs have hardly been explored. Among the general population in Germany aged 18-65 years, a representative online survey with 20 items was conducted in summer 2018 (n = 1000) and analysed by descriptive statistics. The survey assessed: affinity for technology; previous knowledge and experience concerning BCIs; the attitude towards ethical, social and legal implications of BCI use and demographic information. Our results indicate that BCIs are a unique and puzzling way of human-machine interaction. The findings reveal a positive view and high level of trust in BCIs on the one hand but on the other hand a wide range of ethical and anthropological concerns. Agency and responsibility were clearly attributed to the BCI user. The participants' opinions were divided regarding the impact BCIs have on humankind. In summary, a high level of ambivalence regarding BCIs was found. We suggest better information of the public and the promotion of public deliberation about BCIs in order to ensure responsible development and application of this potentially disruptive technology.
Keywords
Management of Technology and Innovation, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
12/11/2021 17:17
Last modification date
23/02/2023 6:53