The use of different types of thermoluminescent dosimeters to measure extremity doses in nuclear medicine

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_BAD560016A18
Type
Inproceedings: an article in a conference proceedings.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
The use of different types of thermoluminescent dosimeters to measure extremity doses in nuclear medicine
Title of the conference
Proceedings of the 16th Solid State Dosimetry Conference
Author(s)
Carnicer A., Ginjaume M., Duch M.A., Vanhavere F., Sans Merce M., Baechler S., Barth I., Donadille L., Ferrari P., Fulop M., Gualdrini G., Krim S., Mariotti M., Ortega X., Rimpler A., Ruiz N., Olko P.
Address
Sydney, Australia, September 19-24, 2011
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2011
Volume
46
Series
Radiation Measurements
Pages
1835-1838
Language
english
Abstract
Depth-dose curves in LiF detectors of different effective thicknesses, together with their responses, were calculated for typical nuclear medicine radiation fields with 99mTc, 18F and 90Y sources. Responses were analysed in function of the radionuclide, detector effective thickness and irradiation geometry. On the other hand the results of the nuclear medicine measurement campaign of the ORAMED project were presented focussing on the dose distribution across the hand and on the appropriate position to wear the dosimeter.According to the results, thin LiF detectors provide better responses in all cases. Its use is essential for 18F, since thick dosimeters can underestimate Hp(0.07) up to a 50% because of the very inhomogeneous dose deposition on the active layer. The preliminary results of the measurement campaign showed that the index tip of the non-dominant hand is usually the most exposed position among the 22 monitored positions. It was also found that, in average, wrist dosimeters are likely to underestimate the maximum skin dose by a factor of the order of 20. This factor is reduced to around 6 for a ring dosimeter worn on the base of the index of the non-dominant hand. Thus, for typical nuclear medicine procedures, the base of the index of the non-dominant hand is recommended as the best monitoring option.
Create date
15/02/2012 16:56
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:28
Usage data