Thymostimulin versus placebo for palliative treatment of locally advanced or metastasised hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III clinical trial.

Details

Ressource 1Download: BIB_B8BD021BE3A3.P001.pdf (2374.55 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: author
Serval ID
serval:BIB_B8BD021BE3A3
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Thymostimulin versus placebo for palliative treatment of locally advanced or metastasised hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III clinical trial.
Journal
Bmc Cancer
Author(s)
Dollinger M.M., Lautenschlaeger C., Lesske J., Tannapfel A., Wagner A.D., Schoppmeyer K., Nehls O., Welker M.W., Wiest R., Fleig W.E.
Working group(s)
AIO Hepatobiliary Study Group
Contributor(s)
Lesske J., Dollinger MM., Fleig WE., Schoppmeyer K., Mössner J., Nehls O., Gregor M., Welker MW., Zeuzem S., Wiest R., Schoelmerich J., Hummel F., Singer M., Seufferlein T., Adler G., Mohr L., Spangenberg HC., Blum H., Pohl M., Schmiegel W., Gog C., Bechstein W., Schaefer C., Stange E., Lammert F., Matern S.
ISSN
1471-2407 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1471-2407
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2010
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
10
Pages
457
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial, Phase III ; Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Randomized Controlled Trial Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thymostimulin is a thymic peptide fraction with immune-mediated cytotoxicity against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in vitro and palliative efficacy in advanced HCC in two independent phase II trials. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of thymostimulin in a phase III trial.
METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical phase III trial. Between 10/2002 and 03/2005, 135 patients with locally advanced or metastasised HCC (Karnofsky >or=60%/Child-Pugh <or= 12) were randomised to receive thymostimulin 75 mg s.c. 5x/week or placebo stratified according to liver function. Primary endpoint was twelve-month survival, secondary endpoints overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), tumor response, safety and quality of life. A subgroup analysis according to liver function, KPS and tumor stage (Okuda, CLIP and BCLC) formed part of the protocol.
RESULTS: Twelve-month survival was 28% [95%CI 17-41; treatment] and 32% [95%CI 19-44; control] with no significant differences in median OS (5.0 [95% CI 3.7-6.3] vs. 5.2 [95% CI 3.5-6.9] months; p = 0.87, HR = 1.04 [95% CI 0.7-1.6]) or TTP (5.3 [95%CI 2.0-8.6] vs. 2.9 [95%CI 2.6-3.1] months; p = 0.60, HR = 1.13 [95% CI 0.7-1.8]). Adjustment for liver function, Karnofsky status or tumor stage did not affect results. While quality of life was similar in both groups, fewer patients on thymostimulin suffered from accumulating ascites and renal failure.
CONCLUSIONS: In our phase III trial, we found no evidence of any benefit to thymostimulin in the treatment of advanced HCC and there is therefore no justification for its use as single-agent treatment. The effect of thymostimulin on hepato-renal function requires further confirmation.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN64487365.
Keywords
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/secondary, Disease Progression, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interferon Inducers/therapeutic use, Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy, Liver Neoplasms/pathology, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Palliative Care, Placebos, Prospective Studies, Survival Rate, Thymus Extracts/therapeutic use, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
22/02/2011 12:49
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:26
Usage data