QRS pattern and improvement in right and left ventricular function after cardiac resynchronization therapy: a radionuclide study.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_B73B0F63FE76
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
QRS pattern and improvement in right and left ventricular function after cardiac resynchronization therapy: a radionuclide study.
Journal
BMC cardiovascular disorders
Author(s)
Domenichini G., Burri H., Valzania C., Gavaruzzi G., Fallani F., Biffi M., Sunthorn H., Diemberger I., Martignani C., Foulkes H., Fleury E., Boriani G.
ISSN
1471-2261 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1471-2261
Publication state
Published
Issued date
11/04/2012
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
12
Pages
27
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains a challenge. We evaluated the role of baseline QRS pattern to predict response in terms of improvement in biventricular ejection fraction (EF).
Consecutive patients (pts) undergoing CRT implantation underwent radionuclide angiography at baseline and at mid-term follow-up. The relationship between baseline QRS pattern and mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis was evaluated. Changes in left and right ventricular EF (LVEF and RVEF) were analyzed with regard to baseline QRS pattern.
We enrolled 56 pts, 32 with left bundle branch block (LBBB), 4 with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and 20 with non-specific intraventricular conduction disturbance (IVCD). A total of 48 pts completed follow-up. LBBB pts had significantly greater improvement in LVEF compared to RBBB or non-specific IVCD pts (+9.6 ± 10.9% vs. +2.6 ± 7.6%, p = 0.003). Response (defined as ≥ 5% increase in LVEF) was observed in 68% of LBBB vs. 24% of non-specific IVCD pts (p = 0.006). None of the RBBB pts were responders. RVEF was significantly improved in LBBB (+5.0 ± 9.0%, p = 0.007), but not in non-specific IVCD and RBBB pts (+0.4 ± 5.8%, p = 0.76). At multivariate analysis, LBBB was the only predictor of LVEF response (OR, 7.45; 95% CI 1.80-30.94; p = 0.006), but not QRS duration or extent of mechanical dyssynchrony.
Presence of a LBBB is a marker of a positive response to CRT in terms of biventricular improvement. Pts with non-LBBB pattern show significantly less benefit from CRT than those with LBBB.
Keywords
Aged, Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy, Bundle-Branch Block/physiopathology, Bundle-Branch Block/therapy, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/methods, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Radionuclide Angiography, Stroke Volume/physiology, Treatment Outcome, Ventricular Function, Left/physiology, Ventricular Function, Right/physiology
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
03/03/2024 16:55
Last modification date
11/03/2024 7:17
Usage data