Treatment of Recurrent Hepatitis C after Liver Transplantation with PEG-Interferon and Ribavirin.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_AE556A5AE7DA
Type
Inproceedings: an article in a conference proceedings.
Publication sub-type
Abstract (Abstract): shot summary in a article that contain essentials elements presented during a scientific conference, lecture or from a poster.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Treatment of Recurrent Hepatitis C after Liver Transplantation with PEG-Interferon and Ribavirin.
Title of the conference
Joint International Congress of ILTS (International Liver Transplantation Society), ELITA (European Society for Organ Transplantation) and LICAGE (Liver Intensive Care Group of Europe)
Author(s)
Antonino A.T., Fontana M., Gioastra E., Moradpour D., Pascual M.
Address
Valencia, Spain, June 22-25, 2011
ISBN
1527-6465
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2011
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
17
Series
Liver Transplantation
Pages
S149
Language
english
Notes
Publication type : Meeting Abstract
Abstract
Background and aim: Recurrent hepati tis C is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after li ver transpl ant ati on (LT), and optimal treatm ent algorithms have yet to be defined. Here, we present our experience of 22 patients with recurrent hepatitis C treated in our institution .Patients and methods: Twenty-two patients with hi stology-proven recurrent hepati tis Cafter LT were treated since 2003. Treatment was ini ti ated with pegylated interferon-a2a 135 IIg per week and ribavirin 400 mg per day in the majority of patients, and subsequent doses were adapted individllally based on on-treatment virologieal responses and c1inical and/or biochemical si de effeets.Results: On an intention-to-treat basis, ustained virological re ponse(SVR) was achieved in 12/21 (54.5%) patie nts (5/12 [41 .6%], 2/3 [67%], 4/5 [80%] and 1/2 [50%] of patients infected with genotypes 1,2,3 and 4, respectively). Two patients experieneed relap e and 6 did not respond to treatm ent (NR). Treatment duration ranged from 24 to 90 weeks. It was stopped prematurely due to adverse events in 6/22 (27.2%) patients (with SVR achieved in 2 patients, NR in 2 patients, and death of 2 patients: one patient awaiting retransplantation and a second patient with HCV-HJV co-infection and fibrosing cholestat ic hepatiti s, nine months after transplantation). Of note, SVR was achi eved in a patient \Vi th combined liver and kidney transplantation. Importantly, SVR \Vas ach ieved in some patients despite the lack ofan early virological response or HCV RNA negativity at week 24. Darbepoetin a and fil ~,'rasti m were used in 36% and 18%, respectively.Conclusion: Individually adapted treatment of recurrent hepatitis C canachieve SVR in a substantial proponion ofLT patients. Conventional stopping rules do not apply in this setting so that prolonged therapy may be useful in selected patients.
Keywords
,
Web of science
Create date
29/06/2011 14:00
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:18
Usage data