Update on the current opinion, status and future development of digital pathology in Switzerland in light of COVID-19.
Details
Download: 34518361_BIB_AD00692E0355.pdf (214.45 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_AD00692E0355
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Update on the current opinion, status and future development of digital pathology in Switzerland in light of COVID-19.
Journal
Journal of clinical pathology
Working group(s)
Swiss Digital Pathology Consortium (SDiPath)
ISSN
1472-4146 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0021-9746
Publication state
Published
Issued date
10/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
75
Number
10
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Abstract
The transition from analogue to digital pathology (DP) in Switzerland has coincided with the COVID-19 crisis. The Swiss Digital Pathology Consortium conducted a national survey to assess the experience of pathologists in dealing with the challenges of the pandemic and how this has influenced the outlook and adoption of DP.
A survey containing 20 questions relating to DP, personal experiences and challenges during the pandemic was addressed to Swiss pathologists at different experience stages in private practice, community and university hospitals.
All 74 respondents were pathologists, with 81.1% reporting more than 5 years of diagnostic service experience. 32.5% reported having read 100 digital slides or more in a diagnostic context. 39.2% reported using whole slide imaging systems at their primary workplace. Key DP use cases before the COVID-19 lockdown were tumour boards (39.2%), education (60.8%) and research (44.6%), with DP used for primary diagnosis in 13.5%. During the COVID-19 crisis, the use of DP for primary diagnostics more than doubled (30% vs 13.5%), with internal consults as important drivers (22.5% vs 16.5%), while research use (25% vs 44.6%) and external consults (17.5% vs 41.9%) strongly decreased. Key challenges identified included a lack of established standard operating procedures and availability of specialised hardware and software.
This survey indicates that the crisis acted as a catalyst in promoting DP adoption in centres where basic workflows were already established while posing major technical and organisational challenges in institutions that were at an early stage of DP implementation.
A survey containing 20 questions relating to DP, personal experiences and challenges during the pandemic was addressed to Swiss pathologists at different experience stages in private practice, community and university hospitals.
All 74 respondents were pathologists, with 81.1% reporting more than 5 years of diagnostic service experience. 32.5% reported having read 100 digital slides or more in a diagnostic context. 39.2% reported using whole slide imaging systems at their primary workplace. Key DP use cases before the COVID-19 lockdown were tumour boards (39.2%), education (60.8%) and research (44.6%), with DP used for primary diagnosis in 13.5%. During the COVID-19 crisis, the use of DP for primary diagnostics more than doubled (30% vs 13.5%), with internal consults as important drivers (22.5% vs 16.5%), while research use (25% vs 44.6%) and external consults (17.5% vs 41.9%) strongly decreased. Key challenges identified included a lack of established standard operating procedures and availability of specialised hardware and software.
This survey indicates that the crisis acted as a catalyst in promoting DP adoption in centres where basic workflows were already established while posing major technical and organisational challenges in institutions that were at an early stage of DP implementation.
Keywords
health care, pathology, quality assurance, surgical, telepathology
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
21/09/2021 10:36
Last modification date
27/05/2023 5:50