Evolution of anaesthesia care and related events between 1996 and 2010 in Switzerland.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_A970CA2AD7B6
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Evolution of anaesthesia care and related events between 1996 and 2010 in Switzerland.
Journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Author(s)
Pittet V., Perret C., Moret V., Despond O., Burnand B.
Working group(s)
ADS Study Group
ISSN
1399-6576 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0001-5172
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2013
Volume
57
Number
10
Pages
1275-1286
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anaesthesia Databank Switzerland (ADS) is a voluntary data registry introduced in 1996. Its ultimate goal is to promote quality in anaesthesiology.
METHODS: The ADS registry analyses routinely recorded adverse events and provides benchmark comparisons between anaesthesia departments. Data collection comprises a set of 31 variables organised into three modules, one mandatory and two optional.
RESULTS: In 2010, the database included 2,158,735 anaesthetic procedures. Over time, the proportions of older patients have increased, the largest group being aged 50-64 years. The percentage of patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status 1 has decreased while the percentage of ASA status 2 or 3 patients has increased. The most frequent comorbidities recorded were hypertension (21%), smoking (16%), allergy (15%) and obesity (12%). Between 1996 and 2010, 125,579 adverse events were recorded, of which 34% were cardiovascular, 7% respiratory, 39% technical and 20% non-specific. The most severe events were resuscitation (50%), oliguria (22%), myocardial ischaemia (17%) and haemorrhage (10%).
CONCLUSION: Routine ADS data collection contributes to the monitoring of trends in anaesthesia care in Switzerland. The ADS system has proved to be usable in daily practice, although this remains a constant challenge that is highly dependent on local quality management and quality culture. Nevertheless, success in developing routine regular feedback to users to initiate discussions about anaesthetic events would most likely help strengthen departmental culture regarding safety and quality of care.
Pubmed
Create date
25/10/2013 15:24
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:13
Usage data