Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients With Severe Upper Limb Paresis: A Pilot, Single-Blind, Randomized Crossover Study.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 28499657_AM.pdf (2039.81 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Author's accepted manuscript
Serval ID
serval:BIB_A8BC00453835
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients With Severe Upper Limb Paresis: A Pilot, Single-Blind, Randomized Crossover Study.
Journal
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
Author(s)
Carda S., Biasiucci A., Maesani A., Ionta S., Moncharmont J., Clarke S., Murray M.M., Millán JDR
ISSN
1532-821X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0003-9993
Publication state
Published
Issued date
08/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
98
Number
8
Pages
1628-1635.e2
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
To evaluate the effects of electrically assisted movement therapy (EAMT) in which patients use functional electrical stimulation, modulated by a custom device controlled through the patient's unaffected hand, to produce or assist task-specific upper limb movements, which enables them to engage in intensive goal-oriented training.
Randomized, crossover, assessor-blinded, 5-week trial with follow-up at 18 weeks.
Rehabilitation university hospital.
Patients with chronic, severe stroke (N=11; mean age, 47.9y) more than 6 months poststroke (mean time since event, 46.3mo).
Both EAMT and the control intervention (dose-matched, goal-oriented standard care) consisted of 10 sessions of 90 minutes per day, 5 sessions per week, for 2 weeks. After the first 10 sessions, group allocation was crossed over, and patients received a 1-week therapy break before receiving the new treatment.
Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment for the Upper Extremity, Wolf Motor Function Test, spasticity, and 28-item Motor Activity Log.
Forty-four individuals were recruited, of whom 11 were eligible and participated. Five patients received the experimental treatment before standard care, and 6 received standard care before the experimental treatment. EAMT produced higher improvements in the Fugl-Meyer scale than standard care (P<.05). Median improvements were 6.5 Fugl-Meyer points and 1 Fugl-Meyer point after the experimental treatment and standard care, respectively. The improvement was also significant in subjective reports of quality of movement and amount of use of the affected limb during activities of daily living (P<.05).
EAMT produces a clinically important impairment reduction in stroke patients with chronic, severe upper limb paresis.

Keywords
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Cross-Over Studies, Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation, Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Prostheses, Paresis/rehabilitation, Pilot Projects, Recovery of Function, Severity of Illness Index, Single-Blind Method, Stroke Rehabilitation/instrumentation, Stroke Rehabilitation/methods, Upper Extremity, Young Adult, Electric stimulation therapy, Hemiplegia, Motor skills, Rehabilitation, Stroke
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
23/05/2017 18:02
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:13
Usage data