Sex differences in adverse events from systemic treatments for psoriasis: A decade of insights from the Swiss Psoriasis Registry (SDNTT).

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_A5BFB7D5A3CD
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Sex differences in adverse events from systemic treatments for psoriasis: A decade of insights from the Swiss Psoriasis Registry (SDNTT).
Journal
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Author(s)
Verardi F., Maul L.V., Borsky K., Steinmann S., Rosset N., Pons H.O., Sorbe C., Yawalkar N., Micheroli R., Egeberg A., Thyssen J.P., Heidemeyer K., Boehncke W.H., Conrad C., Cozzio A., Pinter A., Kündig T., Navarini A.A., Maul J.T.
ISSN
1468-3083 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0926-9959
Publication state
Published
Issued date
04/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
38
Number
4
Pages
719-731
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Psoriasis is a disease that often requires prolonged systemic treatment. It is important to determine the safety of available therapies. There is currently little insight into sex-specific differences in the safety of systemic psoriasis therapies.
To examine the real-world, long-term safety of systemic psoriasis therapies with sex stratification in drug-related adverse events (ADRs).
Ten-year data from adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis requiring systemic treatment (conventional systemic therapies [CST], biologics) were obtained from the Swiss psoriasis registry (SDNTT). ADRs were categorized according to the international terminology Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Safety was assessed by calculating event rates per 100 patient-years (PY). We used descriptive statistics for patient and disease characteristics, and binomial and t-tests to compare treatment groups and sex.
In total, 791 patients (290 females) were included with a mean age of 46 years. 358 (45%) received CSTs and 433 (55%) biologics; both groups had similar baseline characteristics except for more joint involvement in patients using biologics (26.86% vs. 14.8%, p < 0.0001). CSTs were associated with a 2.2-fold higher ADR rate (40.43/100 PY vs. 18.22/100 PY, p < 0.0001) and an 8.0-fold higher drug-related discontinuation rate than biologics (0.16/PY vs. 0.02/PY, p < 0.0001). Trends showed non-significant higher serious adverse event rates per 100 PY for biologics (8.19, CI 6.87-9.68) compared to CSTs (7.08, CI 5.39-9.13) (p = 0.3922). Sex stratification revealed a significantly higher overall ADR rate for all treatments in females (1.8-fold for CSTs [57.30/100 PY vs. 31.69/100 PY] and 2.0-fold for biologics [27.36/100 PY vs. 13.9/100 PY], p < 0.0001), and drug-related discontinuation rates for most CSTs in females.
Females were associated with a significantly higher rate of ADRs and drug-related discontinuation rates. Sex stratification should be taken into consideration when designing studies in the patient-tailored management of psoriasis.
Keywords
Adult, Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Switzerland/epidemiology, Sex Characteristics, Psoriasis/drug therapy, Psoriasis/chemically induced, Biological Factors, Biological Products/adverse effects, Registries, Treatment Outcome
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
15/12/2023 14:59
Last modification date
03/04/2024 7:08
Usage data