Dynamic Cervical Implant versus Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: A Prospective Study of Clinical and Radiologic Outcome.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_A3976D191B42
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Dynamic Cervical Implant versus Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: A Prospective Study of Clinical and Radiologic Outcome.
Journal
Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery
ISSN
2193-6323 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2193-6315
Publication state
Published
Issued date
07/2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
77
Number
4
Pages
300-307
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Objective To evaluate clinical and radiologic outcome in patients treated with a dynamic cervical implant (DCI) or anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). Study Design A prospective comparative cohort study. Methods The study included 60 patients with one- or two-level cervical degenerative disk disease (DDD) undergoing treatment with either DCI (n = 30) or ACDF (n = 30). Clinical and radiologic outcomes were assessed 3 and 12 months after surgery. Clinical scoring systems included the Visual Analog Scale for Neck (VAS-N) and Arm pain (VAS-A), the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD), and the European Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D). Results Both the DCI and ACDF group showed significant clinical improvement 12 months after surgery using the VAS-N (p = 0.034 and p < 0.001, respectively), VAS-A (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), NPAD (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), and EQ-5D (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in clinical outcome comparing both groups at the 3- and 12-month follow-up. The fusion rate at 12 months after surgery was 39.4% and 80.0% in the DCI and ACDF groups, respectively. Radiolucency was found in 90.9% in the DCI group at 12-month follow-up. Conclusion The clinical results for DCI treatment are equivalent to those for ACDF in the treatment of one- and two-level cervical DDD at 12 months after surgery. Further studies are necessary to investigate the high rates of radiolucency and fusion associated with DCI treatment.
Keywords
Adult, Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging, Cervical Vertebrae/surgery, Disability Evaluation, Diskectomy/methods, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/diagnostic imaging, Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery, Male, Middle Aged, Neck Pain/diagnostic imaging, Neck Pain/surgery, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Radiography, Range of Motion, Articular/physiology, Spinal Fusion/methods, Total Disc Replacement/methods, Treatment Outcome
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
18/03/2024 19:55
Last modification date
29/05/2024 6:11