International expert consensus on electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products: a Delphi survey.

Details

Ressource 1Download: e045724.full.pdf (253.34 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_A1C3310390C1
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
International expert consensus on electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products: a Delphi survey.
Journal
BMJ open
Author(s)
Berlin I., Jacot-Sadowski I., Humair J.P., Cornuz J.
ISSN
2044-6055 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2044-6055
Publication state
Published
Issued date
07/09/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Number
9
Pages
e045724
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
To provide a consensus from a panel of international experts about electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and heated tobacco products (HTP).
Cross-sectional survey.
A Delphi survey was conducted among international experts in tobacco control and smoking cessation. The first part addressed statements or recommendations about ENDS, the second about HTP, both divided into four categories: regulation, sale, use and general issues.
Experts from 15 countries.
Individuals with clinical, public health or research expertise in tobacco control and/or smoking cessation.
268 experts were contacted, 92 (34%) completed the first, 55/92 (60%) the second round. Consensus for ENDS: components of e-liquids, an upper limit of nicotine concentration should be defined; a warning on the lack of evidence in long-term safety and addiction potential should be stated; ENDS should not be regulated as consumer products but either as a new category of nicotine delivery or tobacco products; ENDS should not be sold in general stores but in specialised shops, shops selling tobacco or in pharmacies with restriction on sale to minors; administration of illegal drugs is likely with ENDS. Consensus for HTP: HTP have the same addictive potential as cigarettes; they should be regulated as a tobacco product with similar warning messages as cigarettes; their advertisement should not be allowed. ENDS and HTP use should not be allowed in indoor public places; a specific tax should be implemented for ENDS, taxes on HTP should not be lower than those for cigarettes; use of cigarettes is more likely with both ENDS and HTP (dual use) than quitting smoking.
Experts in tobacco control and/or smoking cessation recommend differential regulation for ENDS and HTP. The results of this survey may be useful for health authorities, decision makers and researchers of the tobacco use and cessation field.
Keywords
Consensus, Cross-Sectional Studies, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems, Humans, Nicotine, Tobacco Products, health policy, preventive medicine, public health
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
21/09/2021 14:26
Last modification date
17/08/2022 7:12
Usage data