Long-Term Effect of Ultrathin-Strut Versus Thin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subgroup Analysis of the BIOSCIENCE Randomized Trial.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_A0C60132FEAD
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Long-Term Effect of Ultrathin-Strut Versus Thin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subgroup Analysis of the BIOSCIENCE Randomized Trial.
Journal
Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
Author(s)
Iglesias J.F., Heg D., Roffi M., Tüller D., Noble S., Muller O., Moarof I., Cook S., Weilenmann D., Kaiser C., Cuculi F., Häner J., Jüni P., Windecker S., Pilgrim T.
ISSN
1941-7632 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1941-7640
Publication state
Published
Issued date
08/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
12
Number
8
Pages
e008024
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Equivalence Trial ; Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Randomized trials evaluating the Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES; 60 and 80 μm strut thickness for stent diameters ≤3 and >3 mm, respectively) did not stratify according to vessel size and failed to specify the impact of ultrathin-strut thickness on long-term clinical outcomes compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES). We sought to assess the long-term effect of ultrathin-strut (60 μm) BP-SES versus thin-strut (81 μm) DP-EES on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization for small vessel disease.
In a subgroup analysis of the randomized, multicenter, noninferiority BIOSCIENCE trial, patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome randomly assigned to treatment with BP-SES or DP-EES were stratified according to vessel size (≤3 mm versus >3 mm) as a surrogate to compare patients treated with ultrathin-strut versus thin-strut drug-eluting stent. The primary end point was target lesion failure, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization, within 5 years.
Among 2109 patients, 1234 (59%) were treated for small vessel disease. At 5 years, target lesion failure occurred in 124 patients (cumulative incidence, 22.3%) treated with ultrathin-strut BP-SES and 109 patients (18.3%) treated with thin-strut DP-EES (rate ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.94-1.58; P=0.13). Cumulative incidences of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization and definite stent thrombosis at 5 years were similar in patients treated with ultrathin-strut BP-SES and thin-strut DP-EES. After adjustment for potential confounders, there was no significant interaction between vessel size and treatment effect of BP-SES versus DP-EES.
We found no significant difference in clinical outcomes throughout 5 years between patients with small vessel disease treated with ultrathin-strut BP-SES versus thin-strut DP-EES.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01443104.
Keywords
Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnostic imaging, Acute Coronary Syndrome/mortality, Acute Coronary Syndrome/physiopathology, Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy, Aged, Cardiovascular Agents/administration & dosage, Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects, Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging, Coronary Artery Disease/mortality, Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology, Coronary Artery Disease/therapy, Drug-Eluting Stents, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality, Prosthesis Design, Single-Blind Method, Sirolimus/administration & dosage, Sirolimus/adverse effects, Switzerland, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, coronary artery disease, drug-eluting stent, everolimus, polymer, sirolimus
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
20/09/2019 22:54
Last modification date
23/04/2024 7:01
Usage data