Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Surgical Resection for Treatment of Pancreatic Insulinoma.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_A0A2001C18D6
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Surgical Resection for Treatment of Pancreatic Insulinoma.
Journal
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology
Working group(s)
ERASING study collaborators
Contributor(s)
Alfieri S., Arcidiacono P.G., Arvanitakis M., Battistella A., Bernadroni L., Brink L., Cintolo M., Conti Bellocchi M.C., Davì M.V., Deguelte S., Deprez P., Deviere J., Ewald J., Fabbri C., Ferrari G., Furnica R.M., Gabbrielli A., Garcés-Duran R., Giovannini M., Gonda T., Gornals J.B., Marx M., Mazzola M., Mutignani M., Ofosu A., Pereira S.P., Perrier M., Przybylkowski A., Repici A., Sundaram S., Tripodi G.
ISSN
1542-7714 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1542-3565
Publication state
Published
Issued date
10/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
21
Number
11
Pages
2834-2843.e2
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is emerging as a safe and effective treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. We aimed to compare EUS-RFA and surgical resection for the treatment of pancreatic insulinoma (PI).
Patients with sporadic PI who underwent EUS-RFA at 23 centers or surgical resection at 8 high-volume pancreatic surgery institutions between 2014 and 2022 were retrospectively identified and outcomes compared using a propensity-matching analysis. Primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes were clinical efficacy, hospital stay, and recurrence rate after EUS-RFA.
Using propensity score matching, 89 patients were allocated in each group (1:1), and were evenly distributed in terms of age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, distance between lesion and main pancreatic duct, lesion site, size, and grade. Adverse event (AE) rate was 18.0% and 61.8% after EUS-RFA and surgery, respectively (P < .001). No severe AEs were observed in the EUS-RFA group compared with 15.7% after surgery (P < .0001). Clinical efficacy was 100% after surgery and 95.5% after EUS-RFA (P = .160). However, the mean duration of follow-up time was shorter in the EUS-RFA group (median, 23 months; interquartile range, 14-31 months vs 37 months; interquartile range, 17.5-67 months in the surgical group; P < .0001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the surgical group (11.1 ± 9.7 vs 3.0 ± 2.5 days in the EUS-RFA group; P < .0001). Fifteen lesions (16.9%) recurred after EUS-RFA and underwent a successful repeat EUS-RFA (11 patients) or surgical resection (4 patients).
EUS-RFA is safer than surgery and highly effective for the treatment of PI. If confirmed in a randomized study, EUS-RFA treatment can become first-line therapy for sporadic PI.
Patients with sporadic PI who underwent EUS-RFA at 23 centers or surgical resection at 8 high-volume pancreatic surgery institutions between 2014 and 2022 were retrospectively identified and outcomes compared using a propensity-matching analysis. Primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes were clinical efficacy, hospital stay, and recurrence rate after EUS-RFA.
Using propensity score matching, 89 patients were allocated in each group (1:1), and were evenly distributed in terms of age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, distance between lesion and main pancreatic duct, lesion site, size, and grade. Adverse event (AE) rate was 18.0% and 61.8% after EUS-RFA and surgery, respectively (P < .001). No severe AEs were observed in the EUS-RFA group compared with 15.7% after surgery (P < .0001). Clinical efficacy was 100% after surgery and 95.5% after EUS-RFA (P = .160). However, the mean duration of follow-up time was shorter in the EUS-RFA group (median, 23 months; interquartile range, 14-31 months vs 37 months; interquartile range, 17.5-67 months in the surgical group; P < .0001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the surgical group (11.1 ± 9.7 vs 3.0 ± 2.5 days in the EUS-RFA group; P < .0001). Fifteen lesions (16.9%) recurred after EUS-RFA and underwent a successful repeat EUS-RFA (11 patients) or surgical resection (4 patients).
EUS-RFA is safer than surgery and highly effective for the treatment of PI. If confirmed in a randomized study, EUS-RFA treatment can become first-line therapy for sporadic PI.
Keywords
Humans, Insulinoma/diagnostic imaging, Insulinoma/surgery, Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging, Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery, Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology, Retrospective Studies, Radiofrequency Ablation, Treatment Outcome, Ultrasonography, Interventional, Catheter Ablation, Acute pancreatitis, Hypoglycemia, Insulin, Neuroendocrine Tumor, Pancreatic Fistula
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
13/03/2023 11:21
Last modification date
19/12/2023 7:15