Oral steroid prophylaxis is effective in preventing esophageal strictures after large endoscopic resection.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_9FED44F6F65A
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Oral steroid prophylaxis is effective in preventing esophageal strictures after large endoscopic resection.
Journal
Annals of gastroenterology
Author(s)
Ratone J.P., Bories E., Caillol F., Pesenti C., Godat S., Poizat F., Cassan C., Giovannini M.
ISSN
1108-7471 (Print)
ISSN-L
1108-7471
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
30
Number
1
Pages
62-66
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Strictures are frequent complications of large endoscopic mucosal resections (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissections of the esophagus. Local or systemic steroid therapy has shown promise in the prevention of secondary stenosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of systemic steroid therapy following endoscopic resection of at least hemi-circumferential esophageal mucosa.
This was a single-center retrospective study in a tertiary center. We evaluated patients who were treated with oral steroids between July 2013 and September 2015, after undergoing a large EMR for Barrett's esophagus associated with dysplasia or carcinoma. The steroid protocol used was an initial dose of 30 mg prednisolone, tapered over 8 weeks. Exclusion criteria were a previous attempt at radiofrequency ablation or resection.
Thirty-one patients (27 men) were analyzed: 13 with low-grade dysplasia Barrett's esophagus, 16 with in situ adenocarcinoma, 1 with pT1SM1 adenocarcinoma, and 1 with pT1SM2 adenocarcinoma. Twenty-eight resections (28/31) were completed (R0) in 1-3 sessions (median 2), while 3 resections were R1. The median length of Barrett's esophagus was C3M5 (range C0M2-C10M11) according to the Prague classification. The median follow up was 10 months (range 4-17), during which 4 patients (13%) developed a secondary stenosis. All stenoses were successfully treated by endoscopic dilation (range 1-4). No complications related to dilation or to the steroid therapy were observed.
Our rate of secondary stricture was lower than expected, given the rates of 17-88% in published studies. Systemic oral steroid therapy seems to be effective in reducing potential esophageal stenosis after EMR. Complementary randomized studies are required to confirm whether systemic steroids are an effective primary prophylaxis for esophageal stenosis.
Keywords
Barrett’s esophagus, Esophagus, endoscopic mucosal resection, esophageal strictures, oral steroid therapy
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
07/10/2019 15:30
Last modification date
01/11/2019 7:26
Usage data