Mental health professionals' use of the ICD-11 classification of impulse control disorders and behavioral addictions: An international field study

Details

Ressource 1Download: Fuss_JBA_2024.pdf (1393.59 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_9C594B491588
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Mental health professionals' use of the ICD-11 classification of impulse control disorders and behavioral addictions: An international field study
Journal
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Author(s)
Fuss Johannes, Keeley Jared W., Stein Dan J., Rebello Tahilia J., García José Ángel, Briken Peer, Robles Rebeca, Matsumoto Chihiro, Abé Christoph, Billieux Joël, Grant Jon E., Kraus Shane W., Lochner Christine, Potenza Marc N., Reed Geoffrey M.
ISSN
2062-5871
2063-5303
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
13
Number
1
Pages
276-292
Language
english
Abstract
Background and aims
The ICD-11 chapter on mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders contains new controversial diagnoses including compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD), intermittent explosive disorder (IED) and gaming disorder. Using a vignette-based methodology, this field study examined the ability of mental health professionals (MHPs) to apply the new ICD-11 diagnostic requirements for impulse control disorders, which include CSBD and IED, and disorders due to addictive behaviors, which include gaming disorder, compared to the previous ICD-10 guidelines.
Methods
Across eleven comparisons, members of the WHO's Global Clinical Practice Network (N = 1,090) evaluated standardized case descriptions that were designed to test key differences between the diagnostic guidelines of ICD-11 and ICD-10.
Results
The ICD-11 outperformed the ICD-10 in the accuracy of diagnosing impulse control disorders and behavioral addictions in most comparisons, while the ICD-10 was not superior in any. The superiority of the ICD-11 was particularly clear where new diagnoses had been added to the classification system or major revisions had been made. However, the ICD-11 outperformed the ICD-10 only in a minority of comparisons in which mental health professionals were asked to evaluate cases with non-pathological high involvement in rewarding behaviors.
Discussion and Conclusions
Overall, the present study indicates that the ICD-11 diagnostic requirements represent an improvement over the ICD-10 guidelines. However, additional efforts, such as training programs for MHPs and possible refinements of diagnostic guidance, are needed to avoid over-diagnosis of people who are highly engaged in a repetitive and rewarding behavior but below the threshold for a disorder.
Keywords
Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, General Medicine, Medicine (miscellaneous)
Pubmed
Open Access
Yes
Create date
16/01/2024 10:06
Last modification date
11/04/2024 7:09
Usage data