Mesurer la sévérité des problèmes des patients et leur évolution dans un secteur psychiatrique: une étude sur le terrain du Health of Nation Outcome Scales en français (HoNOS-F) = Measuring patients' problems severity and outcomes in a psychiatric sector: A field study with the French version of the Health of Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS-F)

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_9377E22BD801
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Mesurer la sévérité des problèmes des patients et leur évolution dans un secteur psychiatrique: une étude sur le terrain du Health of Nation Outcome Scales en français (HoNOS-F) = Measuring patients' problems severity and outcomes in a psychiatric sector: A field study with the French version of the Health of Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS-F)
Journal
Annales Médico-psychologiques
Author(s)
Bonsack Charles, Borgeat François, Lesage A
ISSN
0003-4487
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2002
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
160
Number
7
Pages
483-488
Notes
AN - Peer Reviewed Journal: 2002-06989-001 MA - Bonsack [C.: charles.bonsack@inst.hospvd.ch OT - Mesurer la severite des problemes des patients et leur evolution dans un secteur psychiatrique: Une etude sur le terrain du Health of Nation Outcome Scales en francais: (HoNOS-F) LG - French LO - Switzerland Empirical Study. Journal Article PT - Peer Reviewed Journal RF - Bebbington, P., Brugha, T., Hill, T., Marsden, L., & Window, S. (1999). Validation of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. British Journal of Psychiatry 1999; 174: 389-94 Institution : Dept universitaire de psychiatrie adulte, Lausanne, Switzerland Dept universitaire de psychiatrie adulte, Lausanne, Switzerland Ctr de recherche Fernand Seguin, Montreal, PQ, Canada SAPHIRID:48076
Abstract
Examined the ability of the Health of Nation Outcome Scales, designed to measure severity and development of a large range of problems of psychiatric patients, to predict access to psychiatric care, use of services and mental health outcomes. 533 inpatients and outpatients were evaluated in Lausanne, Switzerland. The results show a good acceptance of the scales by clinicians; grouping of problem profiles that suppose specific needs for some populations of patients; differentiation of access to care through the number and severity of problems; and sensitivity to problem outcomes for inpatient care. Limitations of the scales are low tolerance to measurement errors, with only one scale for each dimension, and low progression margin when measuring change of moderate problems, particularly in outpatient care. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)
Create date
10/03/2008 9:47
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:56
Usage data