Mapping the interaction between murine IgA and murine secretory component carrying epitope substitutions reveals a role of domains II and III in covalent binding to IgA

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_916A418A539A
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Mapping the interaction between murine IgA and murine secretory component carrying epitope substitutions reveals a role of domains II and III in covalent binding to IgA
Journal
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Author(s)
Crottet  P., Corthesy  B.
ISSN
0021-9258 (Print)
Publication state
Published
Issued date
10/1999
Volume
274
Number
44
Pages
31456-62
Notes
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't --- Old month value: Oct 29
Abstract
We have identified sites for epitope insertion in the murine secretory component (SC) by replacing individual surface-exposed loops in domains I, II, and III with the FLAG sequence (Crottet, P., Peitsch, M. C., Servis, C., and Corthesy, B. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 31445-31455). We had previously shown that epitope-carrying SC reassociated with dimeric IgA (IgA(d)) can serve as a mucosal delivery vehicle. When analyzing the capacity of SC mutants to associate with IgA(d), we found that all domain II and III mutants bound specifically with immobilized IgA(d), and their affinity for IgA(d) was comparable to that of the wild type protein (IC(50) approximately 1 nM). We conclude that domains II and III in SC are permissive to local mutation and represent convenient sites to antigenize the SC molecule. No mutant bound to monomeric IgA. SC mutants exposing the FLAG at their surface maintained this property once bound to IgA(d), thereby defining regions not required for high affinity binding to IgA(d). Association of IgA(d) with SC mutants carrying a buried FLAG did not expose de novo the epitope, consistent with limited, local changes in the SC structure upon binding. Only wild type and two mutant SCs bound covalently to IgA(d), thus implicating domains II and III in the correct positioning of the reactive cysteine in SC. This establishes that the integrity of murine SC domains II and III is not essential to preserve specific IgA(d) binding but is necessary for covalency to take place. Finally, SC mutants existing in the monomeric and dimeric forms exhibited the same IgA(d) binding capacity as monomeric wild type SC known to bind with a 1:1 stoichiometry.
Keywords
Animals Binding Sites Dimerization Epitopes Immunoglobulin A/metabolism Immunoglobulin A, Secretory/*metabolism Mice Oligopeptides Peptides Protein Binding Protein Structure, Tertiary Receptors, Polymeric Immunoglobulin/genetics/*metabolism
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
25/01/2008 15:53
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:54
Usage data