Impact of coronary CT image quality on the accuracy of the FFRCT Planner.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_91392D7711AB
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Impact of coronary CT image quality on the accuracy of the FFRCT Planner.
Journal
European radiology
Author(s)
Andreini D., Belmonte M., Penicka M., Van Hoe L., Mileva N., Paolisso P., Nagumo S., Nørgaard B.L., Ko B., Otake H., Koo B.K., Jensen J.M., Mizukami T., Munhoz D., Updegrove A., Taylor C., Leipsic J., Sonck J., De Bruyne B., Collet C.
ISSN
1432-1084 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0938-7994
Publication state
Published
Issued date
04/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
34
Number
4
Pages
2677-2688
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Multicenter Study ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
To assess the accuracy of a virtual stenting tool based on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from CCTA (FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner) across different levels of image quality.
Prospective, multicenter, single-arm study of patients with chronic coronary syndromes and lesions with FFR ≤ 0.80. All patients underwent CCTA performed with recent-generation scanners. CCTA image quality was adjudicated using the four-point Likert scale at a per-vessel level by an independent committee blinded to the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner. Patient- and technical-related factors that could affect the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner accuracy were evaluated. The FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner was applied mirroring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to determine the agreement with invasively measured post-PCI FFR.
Overall, 120 patients (123 vessels) were included. Invasive post-PCI FFR was 0.88 ± 0.06 and Planner FFR <sub>CT</sub> was 0.86 ± 0.06 (mean difference 0.02 FFR units, the lower limit of agreement (LLA) - 0.12, upper limit of agreement (ULA) 0.15). CCTA image quality was assessed as excellent (Likert score 4) in 48.3%, good (Likert score 3) in 45%, and sufficient (Likert score 2) in 6.7% of patients. The FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner was accurate across different levels of image quality with a mean difference between FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner and invasive post-PCI FFR of 0.02 ± 0.07 in Likert score 4, 0.02 ± 0.07 in Likert score 3 and 0.03 ± 0.08 in Likert score 2, p = 0.695. Nitrate dose ≥ 0.8mg was the only independent factor associated with the accuracy of the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner (95%CI - 0.06 to - 0.001, p = 0.040).
The FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner was accurate in predicting post-PCI FFR independent of CCTA image quality.
Being accurate in predicting post-PCI FFR across a wide spectrum of CT image quality, the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner could potentially enhance and guide the invasive treatment. Adequate vasodilation during CT acquisition is relevant to improve the accuracy of the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner.
• The fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography (FFR <sub>CT</sub> ) Planner is a novel tool able to accurately predict fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention. • The accuracy of the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner was confirmed across a wide spectrum of CT image quality. Nitrates dose at CT acquisition was the only independent predictor of its accuracy. • The FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner could potentially enhance and guide the invasive treatment.
Keywords
Humans, Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial, Prospective Studies, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Coronary Angiography/methods, Computed Tomography Angiography/methods, Coronary Stenosis/therapy, Predictive Value of Tests, Artifacts, Coronary CT angiography, FFRCT, Image quality, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Planner
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
09/10/2023 13:38
Last modification date
26/03/2024 8:10
Usage data