Central serous chorioretinopathy: Towards an evidence-based treatment guideline.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_8C8BF7E2B09F
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Central serous chorioretinopathy: Towards an evidence-based treatment guideline.
Journal
Progress in retinal and eye research
Author(s)
van Rijssen T.J., van Dijk EHC, Yzer S., Ohno-Matsui K., Keunen JEE, Schlingemann R.O., Sivaprasad S., Querques G., Downes S.M., Fauser S., Hoyng C.B., Piccolino F.C., Chhablani J.K., Lai TYY, Lotery A.J., Larsen M., Holz F.G., Freund K.B., Yannuzzi L.A., Boon CJF
ISSN
1873-1635 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1350-9462
Publication state
Published
Issued date
11/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
73
Pages
100770
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a common cause of central vision loss, primarily affecting men 20-60 years of age. To date, no consensus has been reached regarding the classification of CSC, and a wide variety of interventions have been proposed, reflecting the controversy associated with treating this disease. The recent publication of appropriately powered randomised controlled trials such as the PLACE trial, as well as large retrospective, non-randomised treatment studies regarding the treatment of CSC suggest the feasibility of a more evidence-based approach when considering treatment options. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current rationale and evidence with respect to the variety of interventions available for treating CSC, including pharmacology, laser treatment, and photodynamic therapy. In addition, we describe the complexity of CSC, the challenges associated with treating CSC, and currently ongoing studies. Many treatment strategies such as photodynamic therapy using verteporfin, oral mineralocorticoid antagonists, and micropulse laser treatment have been reported as being effective. Currently, however, the available evidence suggests that half-dose (or half-fluence) photodynamic therapy should be the treatment of choice in chronic CSC, whereas observation may be the preferred approach in acute CSC. Nevertheless, exceptions can be considered based upon patient-specific characteristics.
Keywords
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/drug therapy, Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/surgery, Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/therapy, Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Laser Coagulation, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use, Photochemotherapy/methods, Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Central serous chorioretinopathy, Guideline, Micropulse laser, Mineralocorticoid antagonist, Photodynamic therapy, Retina, Treatment
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
04/08/2019 16:18
Last modification date
15/07/2020 6:26
Usage data