Reporting of Complications in Retinal Detachment Surgical Trials: A Systematic Review Using the CONSORT Extension for Harms.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_82D790C8181F
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Reporting of Complications in Retinal Detachment Surgical Trials: A Systematic Review Using the CONSORT Extension for Harms.
Journal
JAMA ophthalmology
Working group(s)
CORDS Study Group
Contributor(s)
Arevalo F.J., Assi A., Aylward G.W., Barile G., Baumal C., Azuara-Blanco A., Silvia B., Christensen U.C., Crafoord S., de Smet M., Essex R.W., Fawzi A., Figueroa M., Flaxel C., Gottlieb J., Haynes R., Hillier R., Jackson T., Joussen A.M., Kadonosono K., Kruger L., Le Mer Y., Lim J., Lowenstein A., Lois N., Lorenzo-Carrero J., Martinez-Castillo V., Murray T., Natarajan S., Rivett K., Ruiz-Casas D., Saidkasimova S., Sandri L., Sato S., Shunmugam M., Sii S., Smiddy W., Spiteri-Cornish K., Steel D.H., Tornambe P., Upendran M., Valldeperas X., van Meurs J.C., Veckener M., Wickham L., Wolfensberger T.J., Xu Z.Y., Yorston D.
ISSN
2168-6173 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2168-6165
Publication state
Published
Issued date
30/06/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
139
Number
8
Pages
898-905
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Abstract
Knowledge on the frequency and severity of complications in surgical trials for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is essential to determine whether surgical procedures are developed and compared adequately, taking into account not only efficacy but also harms.
To review standards of reporting of complications in recent randomized clinical trials of RRD surgery.
This systematic review included randomized clinical trials on RRD surgery published between January 2008 and January 2021 in Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles retrieved were reviewed for eligibility by 2 independent authors. Eligible studies were evaluated against checklist items from the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Extension for Harms criteria by 2 independent authors, and discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third author.
Fifty studies were included. The median number of checklist items fulfilled was 8 (range, 0-15), of a possible total of 18. Frequently reported items were discussions balanced with regard to efficacy and adverse events (42 studies [84%]) and inclusions of harm-associated timing of data collection (41 studies [82%]). The least frequently reported items were distinctions between expected and unexpected adverse events (1 study [2%]) and mentions of the use of a validated instrument to report adverse event severity (4 studies [8%]). Frequency of complications was commonly reported (29 studies [58%]) in contrast with complication severity (10 studies [20%]).
This review suggests that severity of complications of RRD surgery has been infrequently quantified and reported in randomized clinical trials and potentially represents an important area of improvement in future RRD surgical trials.
To review standards of reporting of complications in recent randomized clinical trials of RRD surgery.
This systematic review included randomized clinical trials on RRD surgery published between January 2008 and January 2021 in Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles retrieved were reviewed for eligibility by 2 independent authors. Eligible studies were evaluated against checklist items from the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Extension for Harms criteria by 2 independent authors, and discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third author.
Fifty studies were included. The median number of checklist items fulfilled was 8 (range, 0-15), of a possible total of 18. Frequently reported items were discussions balanced with regard to efficacy and adverse events (42 studies [84%]) and inclusions of harm-associated timing of data collection (41 studies [82%]). The least frequently reported items were distinctions between expected and unexpected adverse events (1 study [2%]) and mentions of the use of a validated instrument to report adverse event severity (4 studies [8%]). Frequency of complications was commonly reported (29 studies [58%]) in contrast with complication severity (10 studies [20%]).
This review suggests that severity of complications of RRD surgery has been infrequently quantified and reported in randomized clinical trials and potentially represents an important area of improvement in future RRD surgical trials.
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
29/06/2021 10:33
Last modification date
27/05/2023 5:50
Usage data
