Feasibility of a knowledge translation CME program: courriels Cochrane.

Détails

Ressource 1Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Etat: Serval
Version: de l'auteur
ID Serval
serval:BIB_8143E71CDE33
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Feasibility of a knowledge translation CME program: courriels Cochrane.
Périodique
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
Auteur(s)
Pluye Pierre, Grad Roland, Granikov Vera, Theriault Guylène, Frémont Pierre, Burnand Bernard, Mercer Jay, Marlow Bernard, Arroll Bruce, Luconi Francesca, Légaré France, Labrecque Michel, Ladouceur Roger, Bouthillier France, Sridhar Soumya Bindiganavile, Moscovici Jonathan
ISSN
1554-558X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0894-1912
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2012
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
32
Numéro
2
Pages
134-141
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: Systematic literature reviews provide best evidence, but are underused by clinicians. Thus, integrating Cochrane reviews into continuing medical education (CME) is challenging. We designed a pilot CME program where summaries of Cochrane reviews (Courriels Cochrane) were disseminated by e-mail. Program participants automatically received CME credit for each Courriel Cochrane they rated. The feasibility of this program is reported (delivery, participation, and participant evaluation).
METHOD: We recruited French-speaking physicians through the Canadian Medical Association. Program delivery and participation were documented. Participants rated the informational value of Courriels Cochrane using the Information Assessment Method (IAM), which documented their reflective learning (relevance, cognitive impact, use for a patient, expected health benefits). IAM responses were aggregated and analyzed.
RESULTS: The program was delivered as planned. Thirty Courriels Cochrane were delivered to 985 physicians, and 127 (12.9%) completed at least one IAM questionnaire. Out of 1109 Courriels Cochrane ratings, 973 (87.7%) conta-ined 1 or more types of positive cognitive impact, while 835 (75.3%) were clinically relevant. Participants reported the use of information for a patient and expected health benefits in 595 (53.7%) and 569 (51.3%) ratings, respectively.
DISCUSSION: Program delivery required partnering with 5 organizations. Participants valued Courriels Cochrane. IAM ratings documented their reflective learning. The aggregation of IAM ratings documented 3 levels of CME outcomes: participation, learning, and performance. This evaluation study demonstrates the feasibility of the Courriels Cochrane as an approach to further disseminate Cochrane systematic literature reviews to clinicians and document self-reported knowledge translation associated with Cochrane reviews.
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
13/08/2012 9:36
Dernière modification de la notice
03/03/2018 18:47
Données d'usage