FRAX® Adjustment Using Renormalized Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) from L1 Alone may be Optimal for Fracture Prediction: The Manitoba BMD Registry.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_80852BF04285
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
FRAX® Adjustment Using Renormalized Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) from L1 Alone may be Optimal for Fracture Prediction: The Manitoba BMD Registry.
Journal
Journal of clinical densitometry
Author(s)
Leslie W.D., Binkley N., Goel H., McCloskey E.V., Hans D.
ISSN
1094-6950 (Print)
ISSN-L
1094-6950
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
26
Number
4
Pages
101430
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS) used in conjunction with FRAX® improves 10-year fracture prediction. The derived FRAX risk adjustment is based upon TBS measured from L1-L4, designated TBS <sub>L1-L4</sub> -FRAX. In prior studies, TBS measurements that include L1 and exclude L4 give better fracture stratification than L1-L4. We compared risk stratification from TBS-adjusted FRAX using TBS derived from different combinations of upper lumbar vertebral levels renormalized for level-specific differences in individuals from the Manitoba Bone Density Program aged >40 years with baseline assessment of TBS and FRAX. TBS measurements for L1-L3, L1-L2 and L1 alone were calculated after renormalization for level-specific differences. Corresponding TBS-adjusted FRAX scores designated TBS <sub>L1-L3</sub> -FRAX, TBS <sub>L1-L2</sub> -FRAX and TBS <sub>L1</sub> -FRAX were compared with TBS <sub>L1-L4</sub> -FRAX for fracture risk stratification. Incident major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and hip fractures were assessed. The primary outcome was incremental change in area under the curve (ΔAUC). The study population included 71,209 individuals (mean age 64 years, 89.8% female). Before renormalization, mean TBS for L1-3, L1-L2 and L1 was significantly lower and TBS-adjusted FRAX significantly higher than from using TBS <sub>L1-L4</sub> . These differences were largely eliminated when TBS was renormalized for level-specific differences. During mean follow-up of 8.7 years 6745 individuals sustained incident MOF and 2039 sustained incident hip fractures. Compared with TBS <sub>L1-L4</sub> -FRAX, use of FRAX without TBS was associated with lower stratification (ΔAUC = -0.009, p < 0.001). There was progressive improvement in MOF stratification using TBSL <sub>1-L3</sub> -FRAX (ΔAUC = +0.001, p < 0.001), TBS <sub>L1-L2</sub> -FRAX (ΔAUC = +0.004, p < 0.001) and TBS <sub>L1</sub> -FRAX (ΔAUC = +0.005, p < 0.001). TBS <sub>L1</sub> -FRAX was significantly better than all other combinations for MOF prediction (p < 0.001). Incremental improvement in AUC for hip fracture prediction showed a similar but smaller trend. In conclusion, this single large cohort study found that TBS-adjusted FRAX performance for fracture prediction was improved when limited to the upper lumbar vertebral levels and was best using L1 alone.
Keywords
Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Male, Cancellous Bone/diagnostic imaging, Cohort Studies, Manitoba/epidemiology, Risk Factors, Absorptiometry, Photon, Risk Assessment, Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology, Bone Density, Hip Fractures/epidemiology, Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging, Registries, Bone mineral density, Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, Fracture, Osteoporosis, Trabecular bone score
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
29/09/2023 15:05
Last modification date
13/12/2023 8:12
Usage data