Paediatric oral peanut challenges: a comparison of practice in London and Western Switzerland.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_7ED0D3C23650
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Paediatric oral peanut challenges: a comparison of practice in London and Western Switzerland.
Journal
Allergy
ISSN
1398-9995 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0105-4538
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2013
Volume
68
Number
4
Pages
539-541
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish. PDF type: Brief Communication
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are guidelines on how to develop a food challenge protocol, but at present there is no gold standard guidance on method, and separate units produce differing protocols.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 200 patients' data from the paediatric allergy units in Lausanne and Geneva, Western Switzerland, and St Thomas' Hospital (STH), UK.
RESULTS: St Thomas' Hospital has a younger cohort with a lower overall mean spIgE (2.36 kU/l vs 8.00 kU/l, P = 0.004). The target peanut protein volumes differed: Switzerland 4.4 g vs STH 8.4 g. Despite this, the dose actually achieved in positive challenges was not significantly different (2.33 g vs 1.49 g, P = 0.16). 26% of challenges reacted at 4 g or more of peanut protein.
CONCLUSIONS: The differences in results highlight how the variation in reasoning behind food challenge alters the outcome. Standardization of food challenges would allow easy comparison between hospitals and geographical areas for research purposes.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 200 patients' data from the paediatric allergy units in Lausanne and Geneva, Western Switzerland, and St Thomas' Hospital (STH), UK.
RESULTS: St Thomas' Hospital has a younger cohort with a lower overall mean spIgE (2.36 kU/l vs 8.00 kU/l, P = 0.004). The target peanut protein volumes differed: Switzerland 4.4 g vs STH 8.4 g. Despite this, the dose actually achieved in positive challenges was not significantly different (2.33 g vs 1.49 g, P = 0.16). 26% of challenges reacted at 4 g or more of peanut protein.
CONCLUSIONS: The differences in results highlight how the variation in reasoning behind food challenge alters the outcome. Standardization of food challenges would allow easy comparison between hospitals and geographical areas for research purposes.
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
21/04/2013 8:26
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:39