Political ecology and resilience: competing interdisciplinarities?

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: Kull & Rangan 2016 PE resilience authors version.pdf (219.98 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Author's accepted manuscript
ID Serval
serval:BIB_7DF835D4FA13
Type
Partie de livre
Sous-type
Chapitre: chapitre ou section
Collection
Publications
Titre
Political ecology and resilience: competing interdisciplinarities?
Titre du livre
Interdisciplinarités entre Natures et Sociétés: Colloque de Cerisy,
Auteur(s)
KULL Christian A., RANGAN Haripriya
Editeur
P.I.E. Peter Lang
Lieu d'édition
Bruxelles
ISBN
978-2-87574-347-3
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Editeur scientifique
Hubert Bernard, Mathieu Nicole
Série
EcoPolis
Pages
71-87
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Both “political ecology” and “resilience” (or socio-ecological systems) are research approaches that explicitly claim to be inter- or even post-disciplinary. Both of these “interdisciplines” are currently dominant in academic study of society-environment interactions, engaging sizeable communities of students and scholars drawn from a range of traditional disciplines. Both approaches seeks to facilitate the kinds of boundary crossings that are crucial at the interface of nature and society, leading to new insights and knowledge, and to solving problems that are not contained within the boundaries. Yet there are inevitably pressures to “discipline” the new “interdisciplines”. In the case of political ecology and resilience, each has separate intellectual traditions, with some fundamental differences in purpose, in epistemology, in explanatory tools, and in ideology – illustrating that there are multiple ways of being interdisciplinary. This chapter explores these differences and reflects on the meaning of interdisciplinarity.
Création de la notice
02/12/2016 15:44
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:39
Données d'usage