The utility of in-bore multiparametric magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in men with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance-ultrasound software-based fusion targeted biopsy.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_75768B5492B4
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
The utility of in-bore multiparametric magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in men with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance-ultrasound software-based fusion targeted biopsy.
Journal
Urologic oncology
Author(s)
Perrin A., Venderink W., Patak M.A., Möckel C., Fehr J.L., Jichlinski P., Porcellini B., Lucca I., Futterer J., Valerio M.
ISSN
1873-2496 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1078-1439
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
39
Number
5
Pages
297.e9-297.e16
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
To evaluate the utility of in-bore multiparametric magnetic resonance-guided biopsy of the prostate (IB) in patients with visible lesion/s and previous negative software-based multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-targeted biopsy of the prostate (FTB).
We retrospectively analysed prospectively maintained database including consecutive men undergoing IB from March 2013 to October 2017 in 2 European centres expert in this procedure. We selected men with the following criteria: No previous treatment for prostate cancer (CaP), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) lesion(s) PIRADS score ≥ 3, FTB showing no clinically significant cancer (csCaP), and subsequent IB. Patient's characteristics, mpMRI findings, biopsy technique, and histopathological results were extracted. The primary outcome was to determine the detection rate of csCaP, defined as any Gleason pattern ≥ 4. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of positive findings at IB.
Fifty-three men were included. Median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 64-68), median Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) was 7.6 ng/ml (IQR 5.2-10.9), and median prostate volume was 59 ml (IQR 44-84). Fifty-six lesions with PIRADS score 3 in 9 cases (16%), 4 in 30 cases (54%), and 5 in 17 cases (30%) were detected. FTB was performed in all cases using a transrectal approach with 3 different platforms (Toshiba, Koelis, and Artemis). Median time between FTB and IB was 3 months (IQR 1-7). A median of 2 cores per lesion were collected with IB (IQR 2-3). No cancer, clinically insignificant and clinically significant cancer were found in 33 (59%), 9 (16%), and 14 (25%) targeted lesions, respectively. Median maximum cancer core length and maximum positive percentage were 9 mm (3-13) and 55% (21%-80%). The only predictor of csCaP on IB was prostate volume (P = 0.026) with an ideal cut-off at 70 ml.
One in 4 patients with previous negative FTB, IB was able to detect csCaP. According to this study, IB would be of particularly useful in patients with large glands.
Keywords
In-bore biopsy, Magnetic resonance imaging, Prostate cancer, Targeted biopsy
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
29/12/2020 15:19
Last modification date
27/06/2021 6:37
Usage data