Combining repeated blood pressure measurements to obtain prevalences of high blood pressure.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_74D4A9947917
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Combining repeated blood pressure measurements to obtain prevalences of high blood pressure.
Journal
Acta Medica Scandinavica. Supplementum
Author(s)
Wietlisbach V., Rickenbach M., Burnand B., Hausser D., Gutzwiller F.
ISSN
0365-463X (Print)
ISSN-L
0365-463X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
1988
Volume
728
Number
S728
Pages
165-168
Language
english
Abstract
Blood pressure (BP) levels may be classified as normal, borderline, or high with respect to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, but most studies like the MONICA project require at least two BP measurements and must tackle the problem of combining the results of the different readings into a single value for classification. The Swiss MONICA project measured the blood pressure of 1872 individuals in the areas of Vaud and Fribourg. Second BP readings were, on average, lower than the first by 3.2 mmHg for systolic and 1.1 mmHg for diastolic BP. These differences, while trivial at the individual level, nevertheless generate significant effects on prevalences of high BP. The first reading, the second, the mean, and the lowest yield prevalences of 14%, 10%, 11% and 9% respectively. Therefore, any published prevalence of high blood pressure should specify the method of measurement, the number of readings taken, and the way results were combined.
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure Determination/methods, Female, Humans, Hypertension/diagnosis, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Reference Values, Switzerland
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
29/01/2008 9:52
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:32
Usage data