High on sparsity: Interbin compensation of cardiac motion for improved assessment of left-ventricular function using 5D whole-heart MRI.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_716C3BE4D7A2
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
High on sparsity: Interbin compensation of cardiac motion for improved assessment of left-ventricular function using 5D whole-heart MRI.
Journal
Magnetic resonance in medicine
Author(s)
Yerly J., Roy C.W., Milani B., Eyre K., Raifee M.J., Stuber M.
ISSN
1522-2594 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0740-3194
Publication state
In Press
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: aheadofprint
Abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance is the gold standard for evaluating left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Standard protocols, however, can be inefficient, facing challenges due to significant operator and patient involvement. Although the free-running framework (FRF) addresses these challenges, the potential of the extensive data it collects remains underutilized. Therefore, we propose to leverage the large amount of data collected by incorporating interbin cardiac motion compensation into FRF (FRF-MC) to improve both image quality and LVEF measurement accuracy, while reducing the sensitivity to user-defined regularization parameters.
FRF-MC consists of several steps: data acquisition, self-gating signal extraction, deformation field estimations, and motion-resolved reconstruction with interbin cardiac motion compensation. FRF-MC was compared with the original 5D-FRF method using LVEF and several image-quality metrics. The cardiac regularization weight ( ) was optimized for both methods by maximizing image quality without compromising LVEF measurement accuracy. Evaluations were performed in numerical simulations and in 9 healthy participants. In vivo images were assessed by blinded expert reviewers and compared with reference standard 2D-cine images.
Both in silico and in vivo results revealed that FRF-MC outperformed FRF in terms of image quality and LVEF accuracy. FRF-MC reduced temporal blurring, preserving detailed anatomy even at higher cardiac regularization weights, and led to more accurate LVEF measurements. Optimized produced accurate LVEF for both methods compared with the 2D-cine reference (FRF-MC: 0.59% [-7.2%, 6.0%], p = 0.47; FRF: 0.86% [-8.5%, 6.7%], p = 0.36), but FRF-MC resulted in superior image quality (FRF-MC: 2.89 ± 0.58, FRF: 2.11 ± 0.47; p < 10 <sup>-3</sup> ).
Incorporating interbin cardiac motion compensation significantly improved image quality, supported higher cardiac regularization weights without compromising LVEF measurement accuracy, and reduced sensitivity to user-defined regularization parameters.
Keywords
3D radial trajectory, 5D whole‐heart MRI, accuracy, cardiac function, compressed sensing, ejection fraction, free‐running, left ventricle ejection fraction, motion compensation, motion fields, precision, radial MRI, self‐gating
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
25/10/2024 13:38
Last modification date
31/10/2024 7:13
Usage data