EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_713D7F881D3F
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults.
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN
1432-2218 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0930-2794
Publication state
Published
Issued date
08/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
38
Number
8
Pages
4104-4126
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Systematic Review ; Practice Guideline ; Meta-Analysis
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
As the population ages, more older adults are presenting for surgery. Age-related declines in physiological reserve and functional capacity can result in frailty and poor outcomes after surgery. Hence, optimizing perioperative care in older patients is imperative. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways and Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) may influence surgical outcomes, but current use and impact on older adults patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations on perioperative care of older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery.
Expert consensus determined working definitions for key terms and metrics related to perioperative care. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases for 24 pre-defined key questions in the topic areas of prehabilitation, MIS, and ERAS in major abdominal surgery (colorectal, upper gastrointestinal (UGI), Hernia, and hepatopancreatic biliary (HPB)) to generate evidence-based recommendations following the GRADE methodology.
Older adults were defined as 65 years and older. Over 20,000 articles were initially retrieved from search parameters. Evidence synthesis was performed across the three topic areas from 172 studies, with meta-analyses conducted for MIS and ERAS topics. The use of MIS and ERAS was recommended for older adult patients particularly when undergoing colorectal surgery. Expert opinion recommended prehabilitation, cessation of smoking and alcohol, and correction of anemia in all colorectal, UGI, Hernia, and HPB procedures in older adults. All recommendations were conditional, with low to very low certainty of evidence, with the exception of ERAS program in colorectal surgery.
MIS and ERAS are recommended in older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery, with evidence supporting use in colorectal surgery. Though expert opinion supported prehabilitation, there is insufficient evidence supporting use. This work has identified evidence gaps for further studies to optimize older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery.
Expert consensus determined working definitions for key terms and metrics related to perioperative care. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases for 24 pre-defined key questions in the topic areas of prehabilitation, MIS, and ERAS in major abdominal surgery (colorectal, upper gastrointestinal (UGI), Hernia, and hepatopancreatic biliary (HPB)) to generate evidence-based recommendations following the GRADE methodology.
Older adults were defined as 65 years and older. Over 20,000 articles were initially retrieved from search parameters. Evidence synthesis was performed across the three topic areas from 172 studies, with meta-analyses conducted for MIS and ERAS topics. The use of MIS and ERAS was recommended for older adult patients particularly when undergoing colorectal surgery. Expert opinion recommended prehabilitation, cessation of smoking and alcohol, and correction of anemia in all colorectal, UGI, Hernia, and HPB procedures in older adults. All recommendations were conditional, with low to very low certainty of evidence, with the exception of ERAS program in colorectal surgery.
MIS and ERAS are recommended in older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery, with evidence supporting use in colorectal surgery. Though expert opinion supported prehabilitation, there is insufficient evidence supporting use. This work has identified evidence gaps for further studies to optimize older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery.
Keywords
Humans, Aged, Perioperative Care/methods, Perioperative Care/standards, Evidence-Based Medicine, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Consensus, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods, Aged, 80 and over, Abdominal Surgery, Elderly, Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), Frail, Frailty, Laparoscopy, Older adults/aged, Perioperative care, Prehabilitation, Robotic surgical procedures
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
11/07/2024 13:42
Last modification date
06/08/2024 6:02