Dynamic X-ray Microtomography vs. Laser-Doppler Vibrometry: A Comparative Study
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_68AF951B8E7A
Type
Autre: use this type when nothing else fits.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Dynamic X-ray Microtomography vs. Laser-Doppler Vibrometry: A Comparative Study
ISSN
2693-5015 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2693-5015
Issued date
08/08/2024
Language
english
Abstract
There are challenges in understanding the biomechanics of the human middle ear, and established methods for studying this system show significant limitations. In this study, we evaluate a novel dynamic imaging technique based on synchrotron X-ray microtomography designed to assess the biomechanical properties of the human middle ear by comparing it to laser-Doppler vibrometry (LDV).
We examined three fresh-frozen temporal bones (TB) using dynamic synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography for 256 Hz and 512 Hz, stimulated at 110 dB and 120 dB SPL. In addition, we performed measurements on these TBs using 1D LDV, a well-established method.
The normalized displacement values (μm/Pa) at the umbo and the posterior crus of the stapes are consistent or within 5-10 dB differences between all LDV and dynamic microtomography measurements and previously reported literature references. In general, the overall behavior is similar between the two measurement techniques.
In conclusion, our results demonstrate the suitability of dynamic synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography in studying the middle ear's biomechanics. However, this study shows that better standardization regarding acoustic stimulation and measurement points is needed to better compare the two measurement techniques.
We examined three fresh-frozen temporal bones (TB) using dynamic synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography for 256 Hz and 512 Hz, stimulated at 110 dB and 120 dB SPL. In addition, we performed measurements on these TBs using 1D LDV, a well-established method.
The normalized displacement values (μm/Pa) at the umbo and the posterior crus of the stapes are consistent or within 5-10 dB differences between all LDV and dynamic microtomography measurements and previously reported literature references. In general, the overall behavior is similar between the two measurement techniques.
In conclusion, our results demonstrate the suitability of dynamic synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography in studying the middle ear's biomechanics. However, this study shows that better standardization regarding acoustic stimulation and measurement points is needed to better compare the two measurement techniques.
Pubmed
Funding(s)
Swiss National Science Foundation / 20030_192660
Create date
03/09/2024 16:05
Last modification date
05/09/2024 9:00