Heightened clinical utility of smartphone versus body-worn inertial system for shoulder function B-B score.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: journal.pone.0174365.pdf (1281.19 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
ID Serval
serval:BIB_6863F7E9AC02
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Heightened clinical utility of smartphone versus body-worn inertial system for shoulder function B-B score.
Périodique
PloS one
Auteur(s)
Pichonnaz C., Aminian K., Ancey C., Jaccard H., Lécureux E., Duc C., Farron A., Jolles B.M., Gleeson N.
ISSN
1932-6203 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1932-6203
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
12
Numéro
3
Pages
e0174365
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial ; Journal Article ; Validation Studies
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
The B-B Score is a straightforward kinematic shoulder function score including only two movements (hand to the Back + lift hand as to change a Bulb) that demonstrated sound measurement properties for patients for various shoulder pathologies. However, the B-B Score results using a smartphone or a reference system have not yet been compared. Provided that the measurement properties are comparable, the use of a smartphone would offer substantial practical advantages. This study investigated the concurrent validity of a smartphone and a reference inertial system for the measurement of the kinematic shoulder function B-B Score.
Sixty-five patients with shoulder conditions (with rotator cuff conditions, adhesive capsulitis and proximal humerus fracture) and 20 healthy participants were evaluated using a smartphone and a reference inertial system. Measurements were performed twice, alternating between two evaluators. The B-B Score differences between groups, differences between devices, relationship between devices, intra- and inter-evaluator reproducibility were analysed.
The smartphone mean scores (SD) were 94.1 (11.1) for controls and 54.1 (18.3) for patients (P < 0.01). The difference between devices was non-significant for the control (P = 0.16) and the patient group (P = 0.81). The analysis of the relationship between devices showed 0.97 ICC, -0.6 bias and -13.2 to 12.0 limits of agreement (LOA). The smartphone intra-evaluator ICC was 0.92, the bias 1.5 and the LOA -17.4 to 20.3. The smartphone inter-evaluator ICC was 0.92, the bias 1.5 and the LOA -16.9 to 20.0.
The B-B Score results measured with a smartphone were comparable to those of an inertial system. While single measurements diverged in some cases, the intra- and inter-evaluator reproducibility was excellent and was equivalent between devices. The B-B score measured with a smartphone is straightforward and as efficient as a reference inertial system measurement.

Mots-clé
Accelerometry/instrumentation, Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Humans, Humerus/injuries, Injury Severity Score, Joint Diseases/diagnosis, Joint Diseases/physiopathology, Male, Middle Aged, Movement/physiology, Observer Variation, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Severity of Illness Index, Shoulder/physiopathology, Shoulder Injuries/diagnosis, Shoulder Injuries/physiopathology, Smartphone, Surveys and Questionnaires
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
28/03/2017 17:08
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 14:23
Données d'usage