Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Respiratory Effort-Related Arousals in the General Population.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_67C29E36758F
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Respiratory Effort-Related Arousals in the General Population.
Journal
Journal of clinical sleep medicine
ISSN
1550-9397 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1550-9389
Publication state
Published
Issued date
15/08/2018
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
14
Number
8
Pages
1339-1345
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: epublish
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
To determine the prevalence and clinical associations of respiratory effort-related arousals (RERA) in a general population sample.
A total of 2,162 participants (51.2% women, 58.5 ± 11.0 years old, body mass index [BMI] 25.6 ± 4.2 kg/m <sup>2</sup> ) of a general population-based cohort (HypnoLaus, Switzerland) underwent full polysomnography at home. Each subject with a RERA index ≥ 5 events/h was compared with an age-, sex- and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)-matched control without RERA.
A RERA index ≥ 5 events/h was present in 84 participants (3.8%; 95% confidence interval: 3.2-4.8%). In 17 participants (0.8%; 95% confidence interval: 0.5-1.3%), RERAs were the predominant sleep breathing disorder and only one of them complained of excessive daytime sleepiness. Compared to matched controls, subjects with a RERA index ≥ 5 events/h were similar in terms of BMI (26.5 ± 3.5 versus 26.3 ± 4.8 kg/m <sup>2</sup> , P = .73), neck circumference (38.5 ± 3.3 versus 37.6 ± 3.7 cm, P = .10) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (6.7 ± 3.7 versus 6.0 ± 3.7, P = .22). Also, no differences were found for hypertension (21.4% versus 27.4%, P = .47), diabetes (7.1% versus 7.1%, P = 1.00), or metabolic syndrome (31.0% versus 23.8%, P = .39).
In a middle-aged population-based cohort, the prevalence of a RERA index ≥ 5 events/h was low (3.8%) and was not associated with negative clinical outcomes when using the currently recommended scoring criteria of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.
A total of 2,162 participants (51.2% women, 58.5 ± 11.0 years old, body mass index [BMI] 25.6 ± 4.2 kg/m <sup>2</sup> ) of a general population-based cohort (HypnoLaus, Switzerland) underwent full polysomnography at home. Each subject with a RERA index ≥ 5 events/h was compared with an age-, sex- and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)-matched control without RERA.
A RERA index ≥ 5 events/h was present in 84 participants (3.8%; 95% confidence interval: 3.2-4.8%). In 17 participants (0.8%; 95% confidence interval: 0.5-1.3%), RERAs were the predominant sleep breathing disorder and only one of them complained of excessive daytime sleepiness. Compared to matched controls, subjects with a RERA index ≥ 5 events/h were similar in terms of BMI (26.5 ± 3.5 versus 26.3 ± 4.8 kg/m <sup>2</sup> , P = .73), neck circumference (38.5 ± 3.3 versus 37.6 ± 3.7 cm, P = .10) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (6.7 ± 3.7 versus 6.0 ± 3.7, P = .22). Also, no differences were found for hypertension (21.4% versus 27.4%, P = .47), diabetes (7.1% versus 7.1%, P = 1.00), or metabolic syndrome (31.0% versus 23.8%, P = .39).
In a middle-aged population-based cohort, the prevalence of a RERA index ≥ 5 events/h was low (3.8%) and was not associated with negative clinical outcomes when using the currently recommended scoring criteria of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Arousal, Cohort Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods, Monitoring, Ambulatory/statistics & numerical data, Polysomnography/methods, Polysomnography/statistics & numerical data, Prevalence, Respiration, Sleep Apnea Syndromes/diagnosis, Sleep Apnea Syndromes/physiopathology, RERA, cardiovascular risk, excessive daytime sleepiness, general population, polysomnography, sleep apnea, sleep-disordered breathing, upper airway resistance syndrome
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
03/09/2018 10:16
Last modification date
16/12/2019 6:19