Mechanical ventilation in patients with acute brain injury: recommendations of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine consensus.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 33175276_BIB_65FBD2239488.pdf (873.72 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_65FBD2239488
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Mechanical ventilation in patients with acute brain injury: recommendations of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine consensus.
Journal
Intensive care medicine
Author(s)
Robba C., Poole D., McNett M., Asehnoune K., Bösel J., Bruder N., Chieregato A., Cinotti R., Duranteau J., Einav S., Ercole A., Ferguson N., Guerin C., Siempos I.I., Kurtz P., Juffermans N.P., Mancebo J., Mascia L., McCredie V., Nin N., Oddo M., Pelosi P., Rabinstein A.A., Neto A.S., Seder D.B., Skrifvars M.B., Suarez J.I., Taccone F.S., van der Jagt M., Citerio G., Stevens R.D.
ISSN
1432-1238 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0342-4642
Publication state
Published
Issued date
12/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
46
Number
12
Pages
2397-2410
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
To provide clinical practice recommendations and generate a research agenda on mechanical ventilation and respiratory support in patients with acute brain injury (ABI).
An international consensus panel was convened including 29 clinician-scientists in intensive care medicine with expertise in acute respiratory failure, neurointensive care, or both, and two non-voting methodologists. The panel was divided into seven subgroups, each addressing a predefined clinical practice domain relevant to patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with ABI, defined as acute traumatic brain or cerebrovascular injury. The panel conducted systematic searches and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method was used to evaluate evidence and formulate questions. A modified Delphi process was implemented with four rounds of voting in which panellists were asked to respond to questions (rounds 1-3) and then recommendation statements (final round). Strong recommendation, weak recommendation, or no recommendation were defined when > 85%, 75-85%, and < 75% of panellists, respectively, agreed with a statement.
The GRADE rating was low, very low, or absent across domains. The consensus produced 36 statements (19 strong recommendations, 6 weak recommendations, 11 no recommendation) regarding airway management, non-invasive respiratory support, strategies for mechanical ventilation, rescue interventions for respiratory failure, ventilator liberation, and tracheostomy in brain-injured patients. Several knowledge gaps were identified to inform future research efforts.
This consensus provides guidance for the care of patients admitted to the ICU with ABI. Evidence was generally insufficient or lacking, and research is needed to demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of different management approaches.
Keywords
ARDS, Acute stroke, Mechanical ventilation, Respiratory failure, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, Traumatic brain injury
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
16/11/2020 14:32
Last modification date
14/01/2022 8:10
Usage data