Three-Dimensional Quantitative Tumor Response and Survival Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Who Failed Initial Transarterial Chemoembolization: Repeat or Switch Treatment?

Details

Ressource 1Download: cancers-14-03615-v3.pdf (1376.59 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_65E34F7CB115
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Three-Dimensional Quantitative Tumor Response and Survival Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Who Failed Initial Transarterial Chemoembolization: Repeat or Switch Treatment?
Journal
Cancers
Author(s)
Zhao Y., Haroun R.R., Sahu S., Schernthaner R.E., Smolka S., Lin M.D., Hong K.K., Georgiades C., Duran R.
ISSN
2072-6694 (Print)
ISSN-L
2072-6694
Publication state
Published
Issued date
25/07/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
14
Number
15
Pages
3615
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess treatment responses and evaluate survival outcomes between responders and non-responders after each transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) session using the 3D quantitative criteria of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (qEASL) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.
A total of 94 consecutive patients who underwent MR imaging before and after TACE were retrospectively included. Volumetric tumor enhancement (qEASL) was expressed in cubic centimeters (cm <sup>3</sup> ). The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test was used to calculate the overall survival (OS) for the non-/responders.
In total, 28 (29.8%) patients showed a response after the first TACE. These responders demonstrated a clear trend toward longer OS compared with the non-responders (36.7 vs. 21.5 months, p = 0.071). Of the 43 initial non-responders who underwent a second TACE within 3 months and had complete follow-up imaging, 15/43 (34.9%) achieved a response, and their median OS was significantly longer than that of the 28 non-responders to the second TACE (47.8 vs. 13.6 months, p = 0.01). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in OS between the 28 patients who achieved a response after the first TACE and the 15 initial non-responders who achieved a response after the second TACE (36.7 vs. 47.8 months, p = 0.701). The difference in OS between the responders and non-responders after the third TACE was not significant (11.4 months vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.986).
Our study quantitatively demonstrated that a second TACE can be beneficial in terms of tumor response and survival for HCC patients who do not initially respond to TACE.
Keywords
TACE, hepatocellular carcinoma, qEASL, survival, transarterial chemoembolization, tumor response
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
02/08/2022 13:14
Last modification date
07/03/2023 7:48
Usage data