Fatal outcome of a hepatitis B virus transfusion-transmitted infection.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_635AEB11EBCA
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Fatal outcome of a hepatitis B virus transfusion-transmitted infection.
Journal
Vox Sanguinis
ISSN
1423-0410 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0042-9007
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2010
Volume
98
Number
4
Pages
504-507
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Case Reports ; Journal Article Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 2008, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA testing was not yet mandatory for the screening of blood donations in Switzerland. At that time, HBsAg was the only specific mandatory marker for HBV. The importance of high sensitivity for HBV NAT screening is shown.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Donor and recipient of a transfusion-transmitted HBV infection were followed up. Multiple samples were tested for HBV serological and molecular markers.
RESULTS: At donation, the donor appeared healthy, HBsAg was negative and had a normal ALAT level. Ten weeks later, clinical symptoms suggested acute HBV infection as was confirmed with positive HBsAg, HBeAg, anti-HBc IgG, anti-HBc IgM and anti-HBe. The archived sample from the original donation was negative for anti-HBc, but positive for HBV DNA (17 IU/ml). A recipient transfused with the red cell concentrate was HBV DNA positive (3100 IU/ml) 3 months post-transfusion. After five months, HBsAg, HBeAg, anti-HBc and HBV DNA (1.1 x 10(11) IU/ml) were positive. Two weeks later, the patient died from complications associated with HBV infection and his underlying bone marrow disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The present case illustrates the importance of introducing highly sensitive HBV NAT screening strategy to prevent possible HBV transfusion-transmitted infections from donors with low viral load.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Donor and recipient of a transfusion-transmitted HBV infection were followed up. Multiple samples were tested for HBV serological and molecular markers.
RESULTS: At donation, the donor appeared healthy, HBsAg was negative and had a normal ALAT level. Ten weeks later, clinical symptoms suggested acute HBV infection as was confirmed with positive HBsAg, HBeAg, anti-HBc IgG, anti-HBc IgM and anti-HBe. The archived sample from the original donation was negative for anti-HBc, but positive for HBV DNA (17 IU/ml). A recipient transfused with the red cell concentrate was HBV DNA positive (3100 IU/ml) 3 months post-transfusion. After five months, HBsAg, HBeAg, anti-HBc and HBV DNA (1.1 x 10(11) IU/ml) were positive. Two weeks later, the patient died from complications associated with HBV infection and his underlying bone marrow disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The present case illustrates the importance of introducing highly sensitive HBV NAT screening strategy to prevent possible HBV transfusion-transmitted infections from donors with low viral load.
Keywords
Aged, 80 and over, Blood Transfusion/adverse effects, Fatal Outcome, Hepatitis B/transmission, Hepatitis B virus, Humans, Male
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
09/11/2014 15:51
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:19