Chromogranin A measurement in metastatic well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: screening for false positives and a prospective follow-up study
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_60B3B69CF0E0
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Chromogranin A measurement in metastatic well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: screening for false positives and a prospective follow-up study
Journal
Int J Biol Markers
ISSN-L
1724-6008 (Electronic)0393-6155 (Linking)
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2011
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
26
Number
2
Pages
94-101
Language
english
Notes
Vezzosi, DelphineWalter, ThomasLaplanche, AgnesRaoul, Jean LucDromain, ClarisseRuszniewski, Philipped'Herbomez, MicheleGuigay, JoelMitry, EmmanuelCadiot, GuillaumeLeboulleux, SophieLombard-Bohas, CatherineBorson-Chazot, FrancoiseDucreux, MichelBaudin, EricengMulticenter StudyResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tItaly2011/05/17 06:00Int J Biol Markers. 2011 Apr-Jun;26(2):94-101. doi: 10.5301/JBM.2011.8327.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple causes of false-positive chromogranin A (CgA) measurement have been reported that may affect its impact as a surrogate marker of RECIST progression in well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (WDGEPNET). ? AIMS: 1) To evaluate the frequency of false-positive CgA results. 2) To prospectively compare CgA variations with RECIST morphological changes in patients without known causes of false-positive CgA measurements.? METHODS: First, the conditions responsible for potentially false-positive CgA measurements were screened in 184 consecutive patients with metastatic WDGEPNET. Secondly, a variation in CgA at a 6-month interval was compared to RECIST results at 6 months in 46 patients.? RESULTS: Among 184 patients, elevated CgA was found in 130 cases (71%) including 99 patients with at least one cause of a false-positive result. Impaired kidney function as well as medication with proton pump inhibitors were found to be the 2 major causes of false-positive results. The sensitivity and specificity of CgA measurements compared with morphological tumor changes according to the RECIST criteria were 71% and 50%, respectively, at 6 months.? CONCLUSION: Routine screening for the causes of false-positive CgA measurements is mandatory in WDGEPNET patients. Our study does not validate the use of CgA as a surrogate marker of tumor progression.
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Biomarkers, Tumor/*blood, Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/blood/*secondary, Chromogranin A/*blood, False Positive Reactions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/blood/*pathology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Staging, Pancreatic Neoplasms/blood/*pathology
Publisher's website
Create date
16/09/2016 10:13
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:18