General practitioners can evaluate the material, social and health dimensions of patient social status

Details

Ressource 1Download: BIB_5D78EF2BFF14.P001.pdf (211.11 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_5D78EF2BFF14
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
General practitioners can evaluate the material, social and health dimensions of patient social status
Journal
PLOS One
Author(s)
Chatelard S. (co-first), Bodenmann P., Vaucher P., Herzig L., Bischoff T., Burnand B. (co-last)
ISSN
8755-8920 (Print)
ISSN-L
8755-8920
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
9
Number
1
Pages
1-8
Language
english
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify which physician and patient characteristics are associated with physicians' estimation of their patient social status.DESIGN: Cross-sectional ulticentric survey. SETTING: Fourty-seven primary care private offices in Western Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of 2030 patients ≥ 16, who encountered a general practitioner (GP) between September 2010 and February 2011. MAIN MEASURES: PRIMARY OUTCOME: patient social status perceived by GPs, using the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status, ranging from the bottom (0) to the top (10) of the social scale.Secondary outcome: Difference between GP's evaluation and patient's own evaluation of their social status. Potential patient correlates: material and social deprivation using the DiPCare-Q, health status using the EQ-5D, sources of income, and level of education. GP characteristics: opinion regarding patients' deprivation and its influence on health and care. RESULTS: To evaluate patient social status, GPs considered the material, social, and health aspects of deprivation, along with education level, and amount and type of income. GPs declaring a frequent reflexive consideration of their own prejudice towards deprived patients, gave a higher estimation of patients' social status (+1.0, p = 0.002). Choosing a less costly treatment for deprived patients was associated with a lower estimation (-0.7, p = 0.002). GP's evaluation of patient social status was 0.5 point higher than the patient's own estimate (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: GPs can perceive the various dimensions of patient social status, although heterogeneously, according partly to their own characteristics. Compared to patients' own evaluation, GPs overestimate patient social status.
Keywords
Antibodies/classification, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulins/classification, Immunologic Techniques, Infertility/immunology, Male, Spermatozoa/immunology
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
14/04/2014 7:21
Last modification date
21/11/2022 8:30
Usage data