Survival after biventricular mechanical circulatory support: does the type of device matter?

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_5D7121095DBB
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Survival after biventricular mechanical circulatory support: does the type of device matter?
Journal
The Journal of heart and lung transplantation
Author(s)
Kirsch M., Mazzucotelli J.P., Roussel J.C., Bouchot O., N'loga J., Leprince P., Litzler P.Y., Vincentelli A.
Working group(s)
Groupe de Réflexion sur l'Assistance Mécanique
ISSN
1557-3117 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1053-2498
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/2012
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
31
Number
5
Pages
501-508
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Multicenter Study
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Biventricular support can be achieved using paracorporeal biventricular assist devices (BiVADs), the total artificial heart (TAH), and implantable VADs. This study evaluated the influence of the device on patient survival.
Data from 383 patients (321 men [84%]) undergoing primary, planned biventricular support using durable devices between 2000 and 2010 were extracted from the French multicentric Groupe de Réflexion sur l'Assistance Mécanique (GRAM) registry. Mean age was 41.6 ± 14.0 years. Patients were classified as group 1, 255 (67%) with paracorporeal BiVADs; group 2, 90 (24%) with TAH; and group 3, 38 (10%) with implantable BiVADs.
Mean patient support duration was 82.8 ± 107.4 days and similar among groups (p = 0.53). Bridging to transplantation was successful in 211 patients (55%) and to recovery in 23 (6%). Mortality on device was similar among groups (p = 0.16). TAH patients had a significantly lower stroke rate (p < 0.0001). Actuarial estimates for survival while on support were 75.2% ± 2.3%, 64.4% ± 2.7%, 61.1% ± 2.8%, and 56.8% ± 3.1% at 30, 60, 90, and 180 days, respectively, and were similar among groups. However, TAH patients undergoing prolonged support (≥90 days) showed a trend toward improved survival (p = 0.08). Actuarial post-transplant survival estimates were, respectively, 81.7 ± 2.7, 75.3 ± 3.0, 73.0 ± 3.0, and 64.7 ± 3.7 at 1 month and 1, 3, and 5 years and were similar among groups (p = 0.84).
Survival while on support and after heart transplantation did not differ significantly in patients supported with paracorporeal BiVADs, implantable BiVADs, or the TAH. Patients undergoing prolonged support (>90 days) tended to have improved survival when supported with TAH compared with BiVADs, which may be related to a lower incidence of neurologic events.
Keywords
Adult, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices/classification, Female, France, Heart Diseases/mortality, Heart Diseases/therapy, Heart Transplantation, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Waiting Lists
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
28/03/2019 19:18
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:15
Usage data