Response-to-comments about: "Is it really the method for carbon dioxide determination in human postmortem cardiac gas samples using Headspace-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry valid?" from T. Saffaj and B. Ihssane

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_5510E9A51AD7
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Letter (letter): Communication to the publisher.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Response-to-comments about: "Is it really the method for carbon dioxide determination in human postmortem cardiac gas samples using Headspace-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry valid?" from T. Saffaj and B. Ihssane
Journal
Analytica Chimica Acta
Author(s)
Varlet V.
ISSN
1873-4324 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0003-2670
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2014
Volume
810
Pages
43-44
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Saffaj et al. recently criticized our method of monitoring carbon dioxide in human postmortem cardiac gas samples using Headspace-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. According to the authors, their demonstration, based on the latest SFSTP guidelines (established after 2007 [1,2]) fitted for the validation of drug monitoring bioanalytical methods, has put in evidence potential errors. However, our validation approach was built using SFSTP guidelines established before 2007 [3-6]. We justify the use of these guidelines because of the post-mortem context of the study (and not clinical) and the gaseous state of the sample (and not solid or liquid). Using these guidelines, our validation remains correct.
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
21/01/2014 17:58
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:09
Usage data