Effectiveness of high vs lower enteral protein intake, considering energy intake, on clinical outcomes in critically ill children: a systematic review protocol.

Details

Ressource 1Request a copy Under indefinite embargo.
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: All rights reserved
Serval ID
serval:BIB_5502D8DA4391
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Effectiveness of high vs lower enteral protein intake, considering energy intake, on clinical outcomes in critically ill children: a systematic review protocol.
Journal
JBI evidence synthesis
Author(s)
Jotterand Chaparro C., Bertoni Maluf V., Moullet C., Kiszio B., Pugliese M.T., Ramelet A.S., Morice C., Valla F.V., Tume L.N.
ISSN
2689-8381 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2689-8381
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/06/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
21
Number
6
Pages
1251-1258
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
The objective of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of high vs lower enteral protein intake, considering energy intake, on clinical and nutritional outcomes in critically ill children hospitalized in the pediatric intensive care unit.
Over- and undernutrition increases the risk of morbidity and mortality in critically ill children. The impact of high vs lower enteral protein intake on clinical outcomes, considering energy intake, still needs to be investigated in children of different ages.
This review will consider studies of critically ill children (aged between ≥ 37 weeks gestational age and < 18 years) admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit for a minimum of 48 hours and receiving enteral nutrition. Randomized controlled trials comparing high vs lower enteral protein intake, considering energy intake, will be eligible. Primary outcomes will include clinical and nutritional outcomes, such as length of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit and nitrogen balance.
Using the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness, we will search for randomized controlled trials published in English, French, Italian, Spanish, and German in electronic databases, including MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from database inception until the present. We will also search clinical trial registers and, if required, contact authors. Two independent reviewers will screen and select studies for inclusion, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality. A third reviewer will be consulted if necessary. A statistical meta-analysis will be performed if feasible.
PROSPERO CRD42022315325.
Keywords
Child, Humans, Infant, Critical Illness/therapy, Energy Intake, Hospitalization, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Review Literature as Topic, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Child, Preschool, Adolescent
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
02/05/2023 15:44
Last modification date
21/07/2023 6:59
Usage data